Error monitoring in speech production: a computational test of the perceptual loop theory
- PMID: 11259106
- DOI: 10.1006/cogp.2000.0744
Error monitoring in speech production: a computational test of the perceptual loop theory
Abstract
A theory of speech monitoring, proposed by Levelt (1983), assumes that the quality of one's speech is checked by the speech comprehension system. This system inspects one's own overt speech but would also inspect an inner speech plan ("the inner loop"). We have elaborated and tested this theory by way of formalizing it as a computational model. This model includes a new proposal concerning the timing relation between planning the interruption and the repair: the proposal that these two processes are performed in parallel. We attempted to simulate empirical data about the distribution of error-to-cutoff and cutoff-to-repair intervals and the effect of speech rate on these intervals (these intervals are shorter with faster speech). The main questions were (1) Is an inner monitor that utilizes the speech perception system fast enough to simulate the timing data? (2) Can the model account for the effects of speech rate on these intervals? We conclude that including an inner loop through the speech comprehension system generates predictions that fit the empirical data. The effects of speed can be accounted for, given our proposal about the time course of planning interruption and repair. A novel prediction is that the error-to-cutoff interval decreases with increasing position in the phrase.
Copyright 2001 Academic Press.
Similar articles
-
Effects of time pressure on mechanisms of speech production and self-monitoring.J Psycholinguist Res. 2001 Mar;30(2):163-84. doi: 10.1023/a:1010377828778. J Psycholinguist Res. 2001. PMID: 11385824
-
The covert repair hypothesis: prearticulatory repair processes in normal and stuttered disfluencies.J Speech Hear Res. 1993 Jun;36(3):472-87. J Speech Hear Res. 1993. PMID: 8331905 Review.
-
Perceptual uniqueness point effects in monitoring internal speech.Cognition. 2007 Nov;105(2):457-65. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2006.10.006. Epub 2006 Dec 6. Cognition. 2007. PMID: 17156770
-
Detection of errors during speech production: a review of speech monitoring models.Cognition. 2000 Nov 16;77(2):97-132. doi: 10.1016/s0010-0277(00)00090-1. Cognition. 2000. PMID: 10986364 Review.
-
Disfluencies and human language comprehension.Trends Cogn Sci. 2004 May;8(5):231-7. doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2004.03.011. Trends Cogn Sci. 2004. PMID: 15120682 Review.
Cited by
-
How trial-to-trial learning shapes mappings in the mental lexicon: Modelling lexical decision with linear discriminative learning.Cogn Psychol. 2023 Nov;146:101598. doi: 10.1016/j.cogpsych.2023.101598. Epub 2023 Sep 14. Cogn Psychol. 2023. PMID: 37716109 Free PMC article.
-
Running away from phonological ambiguity, we stumble upon our words: Laboratory induced slips show differences between highly and lowly defensive people.Front Hum Neurosci. 2023 Mar 29;17:1033671. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2023.1033671. eCollection 2023. Front Hum Neurosci. 2023. PMID: 37063107 Free PMC article.
-
From self-regulated learning to computer-delivered integrated speaking testing: Does monitoring always monitor?Front Psychol. 2023 Feb 1;14:1028754. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1028754. eCollection 2023. Front Psychol. 2023. PMID: 36818077 Free PMC article.
-
Learning from errors: Exploration of the monitoring learning effect.Cognition. 2022 Jul;224:105057. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2022.105057. Epub 2022 Feb 23. Cognition. 2022. PMID: 35218984 Free PMC article.
-
Domain-general conflict monitoring predicts neural and behavioral indices of linguistic error processing during reading comprehension.J Exp Psychol Gen. 2022 Jul;151(7):1502-1519. doi: 10.1037/xge0001130. Epub 2021 Nov 29. J Exp Psychol Gen. 2022. PMID: 34843366 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
