Evaluation of atypical glandular cells of undetermined significance: is age important?

Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2001 Jun;184(7):1457-9; discussion 1459-61. doi: 10.1067/mob.2001.114849.

Abstract

Objective: Our purpose was to assess the effect of age on the incidence of significant pathologic findings in patients with atypical glandular cells of undetermined significance.

Study design: This retrospective study evaluated nonreferred patients with Papanicolaou smears showing atypical glandular cells of undetermined significance over a 5-year period.

Results: Two hundred eighty-one women (91%) with Papanicolaou smears showing atypical glandular cells of undetermined significance were available for follow-up. Significant abnormality was found in 90 subjects (32%), including 31 women (11%) with cancer. Older patients (> or =50 years old) have lower odds of high-grade cervical dysplasia (odds ratio = 0.21; 95% CI: 0.32-0.40) and higher odds of uterine cancer (odds ratio = 12.88; 95% CI: 1.78-567.60) compared with younger patients.

Conclusions: Women with Papanicolaou smears showing atypical glandular cells of undetermined significance have a 1 in 3 chance of having significant abnormality. Evaluation includes colposcopy, endocervical curettage, and appropriate cervical biopsies. Patients >45 years require endometrial biopsies.

MeSH terms

  • Adult
  • Aged
  • Aged, 80 and over
  • Aging / physiology*
  • Cervix Uteri / pathology*
  • Female
  • Humans
  • Incidence
  • Middle Aged
  • Odds Ratio
  • Papanicolaou Test
  • Retrospective Studies
  • Uterine Cervical Dysplasia / epidemiology
  • Uterine Cervical Dysplasia / pathology*
  • Uterine Cervical Neoplasms / epidemiology
  • Uterine Cervical Neoplasms / pathology*
  • Vaginal Smears