On the wrong side of the tracts? Evaluating the accuracy of geocoding in public health research
- PMID: 11441740
- PMCID: PMC1446703
- DOI: 10.2105/ajph.91.7.1114
On the wrong side of the tracts? Evaluating the accuracy of geocoding in public health research
Abstract
Objectives: This study sought to determine the accuracy of geocoding for public health databases.
Methods: A test file of 70 addresses, 50 of which involved errors, was generated, and the file was geocoded to the census tract and block group levels by 4 commercial geocoding firms. Also, the "real world" accuracy of the best-performing firm was evaluated.
Results: Accuracy rates in regard to geocoding of the test file ranged from 44% (95% confidence interval [CI] = 32%, 56%) to 84% (95% CI = 73%, 92%). The geocoding firm identified as having the best accuracy rate correctly geocoded 96% of the addresses obtained from the public health databases.
Conclusions: Public health studies involving geocoded databases should evaluate and report on methods used to verify accuracy.
Similar articles
-
Positional accuracy of two methods of geocoding.Epidemiology. 2005 Jul;16(4):542-7. doi: 10.1097/01.ede.0000165364.54925.f3. Epidemiology. 2005. PMID: 15951673
-
Comparing a single-stage geocoding method to a multi-stage geocoding method: how much and where do they disagree?Int J Health Geogr. 2007 Mar 16;6:12. doi: 10.1186/1476-072X-6-12. Int J Health Geogr. 2007. PMID: 17367520 Free PMC article.
-
Geocoding accuracy and the recovery of relationships between environmental exposures and health.Int J Health Geogr. 2008 Apr 3;7:13. doi: 10.1186/1476-072X-7-13. Int J Health Geogr. 2008. PMID: 18387189 Free PMC article.
-
Positional accuracy and geographic bias of four methods of geocoding in epidemiologic research.Ann Epidemiol. 2007 Jun;17(6):464-70. doi: 10.1016/j.annepidem.2006.10.015. Epub 2007 Apr 19. Ann Epidemiol. 2007. PMID: 17448683
-
Quantitative analyses of scientific literature and their validity for judging Latin American production.Bull Pan Am Health Organ. 1995 Dec;29(4):352-9; discussion 359-60. Bull Pan Am Health Organ. 1995. PMID: 8605526 Review. No abstract available.
Cited by
-
Enabling Hotspot Detection and Public Health Response to the COVID-19 Pandemic.Prev Chronic Dis. 2022 Jun 30;19:E35. doi: 10.5888/pcd19.210425. Prev Chronic Dis. 2022. PMID: 35772038 Free PMC article.
-
Healthy Food Density is Not Associated With Diet Quality Among Pregnant Women With Overweight/Obesity in South Carolina.J Nutr Educ Behav. 2021 Feb;53(2):120-129. doi: 10.1016/j.jneb.2020.11.014. J Nutr Educ Behav. 2021. PMID: 33573765 Free PMC article.
-
Spatial Heterogeneity in Positional Errors: A Comparison of Two Residential Geocoding Efforts in the Agricultural Health Study.Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Feb 9;18(4):1637. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18041637. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021. PMID: 33572119 Free PMC article.
-
Starter Kit for Geotagging and Geovisualization in Health Care: Resource Paper.JMIR Form Res. 2020 Dec 24;4(12):e23379. doi: 10.2196/23379. JMIR Form Res. 2020. PMID: 33361054 Free PMC article.
-
GIScience and cancer: State of the art and trends for cancer surveillance and epidemiology.Cancer. 2019 Aug 1;125(15):2544-2560. doi: 10.1002/cncr.32052. Epub 2019 May 30. Cancer. 2019. PMID: 31145834 Free PMC article. Review.
References
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grant support
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
