Topical anesthesia with or without propofol sedation versus retrobulbar/peribulbar anesthesia for cataract extraction: prospective randomized trial

J Cataract Refract Surg. 2001 Sep;27(9):1372-9. doi: 10.1016/s0886-3350(01)00800-8.

Abstract

Purpose: To evaluate the feasibility of intravenous sedation in addition to topical anesthesia during cataract extraction.

Setting: Helsinki University Eye Hospital, Helsinki, Finland.

Methods: Three hundred seventeen eyes of 291 consecutive patients having cataract surgery were prospectively randomized to receive topical (oxybuprocaine 0.4%, n = 96), combined (topical anesthesia and propofol sedation, n = 107), or retrobulbar/peribulbar (prilocaine 1.5%, n = 114) anesthesia. The intraoperative conditions were judged by the surgeon. A numerical scale (0 to 10) was used to assess the degree of pain during surgery. Outcome measures were the number of complications and adverse events registered perioperatively and 1 week postoperatively as well as Snellen visual acuity.

Results: The success of posterior chamber intraocular lens (IOL) implantation through a self-sealing clear corneal incision was 97.9%, 96.3%, and 98.2% in the topical, combined, and retrobulbar/peribulbar groups, respectively. There was no difference among the groups in pain during surgery, frequency of complications, or outcome measures. One week postoperatively, visual acuity was 20/40 or better in 81.7%, 78.5%, and 77.5% of eyes in the topical, combined, and retrobulbar/peribulbar groups, respectively. The surgeon reported significantly fewer difficulties in the retrobulbar/peribulbar group (9.8%) than in the topical (26.0%) (P =.004) or combined (21.0%) (P =.036) groups. Additional sedative/analgesic medication given intraoperatively was required significantly more often in the topical (15.6%) than in the retrobulbar/peribulbar group (2.6%) (P =.002). Patients with bilateral surgery preferred combined anesthesia over retrobulbar/peribulbar anesthesia; however, there was no significant difference in patient acceptance among groups in patients having unilateral surgery.

Conclusion: Intravenous propofol sedation added to topical anesthesia did not improve the operative conditions or surgical outcome. Retrobulbar/peribulbar anesthesia ensured the best surgical conditions. Patients in all anesthesia groups reported high satisfaction. However, patients having bilateral surgery seemed to prefer combined anesthesia over retrobulbar/peribulbar anesthesia.

Publication types

  • Clinical Trial
  • Comparative Study
  • Evaluation Study
  • Randomized Controlled Trial

MeSH terms

  • Adult
  • Aged
  • Aged, 80 and over
  • Anesthesia, Local
  • Anesthetics, Combined / administration & dosage*
  • Anesthetics, Intravenous / administration & dosage
  • Anesthetics, Local / administration & dosage*
  • Cataract Extraction*
  • Female
  • Humans
  • Hypnotics and Sedatives / administration & dosage*
  • Lens Implantation, Intraocular
  • Male
  • Middle Aged
  • Orbit / drug effects
  • Pain Measurement
  • Patient Satisfaction
  • Prilocaine / administration & dosage*
  • Procaine / administration & dosage*
  • Procaine / analogs & derivatives
  • Propofol / administration & dosage*
  • Prospective Studies
  • Treatment Outcome
  • Visual Acuity

Substances

  • Anesthetics, Combined
  • Anesthetics, Intravenous
  • Anesthetics, Local
  • Hypnotics and Sedatives
  • Prilocaine
  • Procaine
  • benoxinate
  • Propofol