Constructing "sound science" and "good epidemiology": tobacco, lawyers, and public relations firms
- PMID: 11684593
- PMCID: PMC1446868
- DOI: 10.2105/ajph.91.11.1749
Constructing "sound science" and "good epidemiology": tobacco, lawyers, and public relations firms
Abstract
The tobacco industry has attacked "junk science" to discredit the evidence that secondhand smoke-among other environmental toxins-causes disease. Philip Morris used public relations firms and lawyers to develop a "sound science" program in the United States and Europe that involved recruiting other industries and issues to obscure the tobacco industry's role. The European "sound science" plans included a version of "good epidemiological practices" that would make it impossible to conclude that secondhand smoke-and thus other environmental toxins-caused diseases. Public health professionals need to be aware that the "sound science" movement is not an indigenous effort from within the profession to improve the quality of scientific discourse, but reflects sophisticated public relations campaigns controlled by industry executives and lawyers whose aim is to manipulate the standards of scientific proof to serve the corporate interests of their clients.
Comment in
-
Turning science into junk: the tobacco industry and passive smoking.Am J Public Health. 2001 Nov;91(11):1742-4. doi: 10.2105/ajph.91.11.1742. Am J Public Health. 2001. PMID: 11684591 Free PMC article.
-
Junking science to promote tobacco.Am J Public Health. 2001 Nov;91(11):1745-8. doi: 10.2105/ajph.91.11.1745. Am J Public Health. 2001. PMID: 11684592 Free PMC article.
Similar articles
-
Turning science into junk: the tobacco industry and passive smoking.Am J Public Health. 2001 Nov;91(11):1742-4. doi: 10.2105/ajph.91.11.1742. Am J Public Health. 2001. PMID: 11684591 Free PMC article.
-
Turning free speech into corporate speech: Philip Morris' efforts to influence U.S. and European journalists regarding the U.S. EPA report on secondhand smoke.Prev Med. 2004 Sep;39(3):568-80. doi: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2004.02.014. Prev Med. 2004. PMID: 15313097 Review.
-
Junking science to promote tobacco.Am J Public Health. 2001 Nov;91(11):1745-8. doi: 10.2105/ajph.91.11.1745. Am J Public Health. 2001. PMID: 11684592 Free PMC article.
-
Changing conclusions on secondhand smoke in a sudden infant death syndrome review funded by the tobacco industry.Pediatrics. 2005 Mar;115(3):e356-66. doi: 10.1542/peds.2004-1922. Pediatrics. 2005. PMID: 15741361
-
Science for hire: a tobacco industry strategy to influence public opinion on secondhand smoke.Nicotine Tob Res. 2003 Jun;5(3):303-14. doi: 10.1080/1462220031000094169. Nicotine Tob Res. 2003. PMID: 12791525 Review.
Cited by
-
Evidence Synthesis of Observational Studies in Environmental Health: Lessons Learned from a Systematic Review on Traffic-Related Air Pollution.Environ Health Perspect. 2023 Nov;131(11):115002. doi: 10.1289/EHP11532. Epub 2023 Nov 22. Environ Health Perspect. 2023. PMID: 37991444 Free PMC article.
-
Conflicts of Interest in the Assessment of Chemicals, Waste, and Pollution.Environ Sci Technol. 2023 Dec 5;57(48):19066-19077. doi: 10.1021/acs.est.3c04213. Epub 2023 Nov 9. Environ Sci Technol. 2023. PMID: 37943968 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Influence of Disclosed and Undisclosed Funding Sources in Tobacco Harm Reduction Discourse: A Social Network Analysis.Nicotine Tob Res. 2023 Nov 22;25(12):1829-1837. doi: 10.1093/ntr/ntac250. Nicotine Tob Res. 2023. PMID: 36308511 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Manufacturing doubt: Assessing the effects of independent vs industry-sponsored messaging about the harms of fossil fuels, smoking, alcohol, and sugar sweetened beverages.SSM Popul Health. 2021 Dec 23;17:101009. doi: 10.1016/j.ssmph.2021.101009. eCollection 2022 Mar. SSM Popul Health. 2021. PMID: 35036514 Free PMC article.
-
Environmental epidemiology in a crossfire.Environ Health. 2021 Aug 19;20(1):91. doi: 10.1186/s12940-021-00776-1. Environ Health. 2021. PMID: 34412648 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Hollingsworth P. The “junk science” dilemma. Am Scientist. 2000; 88:2–4.
-
- Huber P. Galileo's Revenge: Junk Science in the Courtroom. New York, NY: Basic Books; 1991.
-
- Schwartz J. Only good science to keep on debating “junk science.” Houston Chronicle. March 28, 1999:5
-
- Price J, Svitak L. It's time we took “junk science” out of the courtroom. Star-Tribune [Minneapolis]. June 20, 1999:5D.
-
- Price J, Rosenberg E. The war against junk science: the use of expert panels in complex medical-legal scientific litigation. Biomaterials. 1998;19: 1425–1432. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
