Similar effectiveness of paroxetine, fluoxetine, and sertraline in primary care: a randomized trial
- PMID: 11743835
- DOI: 10.1001/jama.286.23.2947
Similar effectiveness of paroxetine, fluoxetine, and sertraline in primary care: a randomized trial
Abstract
Context: Selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) are the most commonly prescribed class of antidepressant, yet it is not known whether one SSRI is more effective than another.
Objective: To compare the effectiveness of 3 SSRIs (paroxetine, fluoxetine, and sertraline) in depressed primary care patients.
Design: Open-label, randomized, intention-to-treat trial, with patient enrollment occurring in April-November 1999.
Setting: Thirty-seven clinics in 2 US primary care research networks.
Patients: A total of 573 depressed adult patients for whom their primary care physician thought that antidepressant therapy was warranted and who completed a baseline interview.
Interventions: Patients were randomly assigned to receive paroxetine (n = 189), fluoxetine (n = 193), or sertraline (n = 191) for 9 months. Primary care physicians were allowed to switch patients to a different SSRI or non-SSRI antidepressant if they did not adequately respond to or tolerate the initial SSRI.
Main outcome measures: The primary outcome measure was change in the Medical Outcomes Study 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36) Mental Component Summary score (range, 0-100), compared across treatment groups at 1, 3, 6, and 9 months. Secondary outcomes included other depression and psychological measures, multiple measures of social and work functioning, and other domains of health-related quality of life, such as physical functioning, concentration and memory, vitality, bodily pain, sleep, and sexual functioning.
Results: Follow-up interviews were successfully completed in 94% of patients at 1 month, 87% at 3 months, 84% at 6 months, and 79% at 9 months. Responses to the 3 SSRIs were comparable on all measures and at all time points. The mean change in the SF-36 Mental Component Summary score at 9 months was + 15.8 in the paroxetine group, + 15.1 in the fluoxetine group, and + 17.4 in the sertraline group. The drugs were also associated with similar incidences of adverse effects and discontinuation rates.
Conclusions: The SSRI antidepressants paroxetine, fluoxetine, and sertraline were similar in effectiveness for depressive symptoms as well as multiple domains of health-related quality of life over the entire 9 months of this trial.
Comment in
-
Choosing a first-line antidepressant: equal on average does not mean equal for everyone.JAMA. 2001 Dec 19;286(23):3003-4. doi: 10.1001/jama.286.23.3003. JAMA. 2001. PMID: 11743843 No abstract available.
-
Immune-based, targeted therapy for allergic diseases.JAMA. 2001 Dec 19;286(23):3005-6. doi: 10.1001/jama.286.23.3005. JAMA. 2001. PMID: 11743844 No abstract available.
-
Is one selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor better than another?JAMA. 2002 Apr 17;287(15):1935; author reply 1937-8. JAMA. 2002. PMID: 11960525 No abstract available.
-
Is one selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor better than another?JAMA. 2002 Apr 17;287(15):1935-6; author reply 1937-8. JAMA. 2002. PMID: 11960526 No abstract available.
-
Is one selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor better than another?JAMA. 2002 Apr 17;287(15):1936; author reply 1937-8. JAMA. 2002. PMID: 11960527 No abstract available.
-
Is one selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor better than another?JAMA. 2002 Apr 17;287(15):1936-7; author reply 1937-8. JAMA. 2002. PMID: 11960528 No abstract available.
Similar articles
-
Fluoxetine versus sertraline and paroxetine in major depression: tolerability and efficacy in anxious depression.J Affect Disord. 2000 Aug;59(2):119-26. doi: 10.1016/s0165-0327(99)00131-7. J Affect Disord. 2000. PMID: 10837880 Clinical Trial.
-
The outcome of physical symptoms with treatment of depression.J Gen Intern Med. 2004 Aug;19(8):813-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1525-1497.2004.30531.x. J Gen Intern Med. 2004. PMID: 15242465 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
Course and cost of treatment for depression with fluoxetine, paroxetine, and sertraline.Am J Manag Care. 1999 May;5(5):597-606. Am J Manag Care. 1999. PMID: 10537866
-
Spotlight on sertraline in the management of major depressive disorder in elderly patients.CNS Drugs. 2002;16(11):789-94. doi: 10.2165/00023210-200216110-00011. CNS Drugs. 2002. PMID: 12383038 Review.
-
A comparative review of escitalopram, paroxetine, and sertraline: Are they all alike?Int Clin Psychopharmacol. 2014 Jul;29(4):185-96. doi: 10.1097/YIC.0000000000000023. Int Clin Psychopharmacol. 2014. PMID: 24424469 Free PMC article. Review.
Cited by
-
Duloxetine and cognitive behavioral therapy with phone-based support for the treatment of chronic musculoskeletal pain: study protocol of the PRECICE randomized control trial.Trials. 2024 May 18;25(1):330. doi: 10.1186/s13063-024-08158-x. Trials. 2024. PMID: 38762720 Free PMC article.
-
Duloxetine and Cognitive Behavioral Therapy with Phone-based Support for the Treatment of Chronic Musculoskeletal Pain: Study Protocol of the PRECICE Randomized Control Trial.Res Sq [Preprint]. 2024 Apr 15:rs.3.rs-3924330. doi: 10.21203/rs.3.rs-3924330/v1. Res Sq. 2024. Update in: Trials. 2024 May 18;25(1):330. doi: 10.1186/s13063-024-08158-x. PMID: 38699346 Free PMC article. Updated. Preprint.
-
Omega-3 Fatty Acids Supplementation in the Treatment of Depression: An Observational Study.J Pers Med. 2023 Jan 27;13(2):224. doi: 10.3390/jpm13020224. J Pers Med. 2023. PMID: 36836458 Free PMC article.
-
Comorbid eating, depressive, and anxiety psychopathology is associated with elevated shame in women with food insecurity.Int J Eat Disord. 2023 Jun;56(6):1087-1097. doi: 10.1002/eat.23913. Epub 2023 Feb 12. Int J Eat Disord. 2023. PMID: 36775981 Free PMC article.
-
Application of the Delphi Method in the Study of Depressive Disorder.Front Psychiatry. 2022 Jul 7;13:925610. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2022.925610. eCollection 2022. Front Psychiatry. 2022. PMID: 35873226 Free PMC article. Review.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Miscellaneous
