Moving to directly cued locations abolishes spatial interference during bimanual actions
- PMID: 11760137
- DOI: 10.1111/1467-9280.00391
Moving to directly cued locations abolishes spatial interference during bimanual actions
Abstract
Interference is frequently observed during bimanual movements if the two hands perform nonsymmetric actions. We examined the source of bimanual interference in two experiments in which we compared conditions involving symmetric movements with conditions in which the movements were of different amplitudes or different directions. The target movements were cued either symbolically by letters or directly by the onset of the target locations. With symbolic cues, reaction times were longer when the movements of the two hands were not symmetric. With direct cues, reaction times were the same for symmetric and nonsymmetric movements. These results indicate that directly cued actions can be programmed in parallel for the two hands. Our results challenge the hypothesis that the cost to initiate nonsymmetric movements is due to spatial intetference in a motor-programming stage. Rather the cost appears to be caused by stimulus identification, response-selection processes connected to the processing of symbolic cues, or both.
Similar articles
-
Bimanual interference in rapid discrete movements is task specific and occurs at multiple levels of processing.J Neurophysiol. 2005 Sep;94(3):1861-8. doi: 10.1152/jn.00320.2005. Epub 2005 May 25. J Neurophysiol. 2005. PMID: 15917318
-
The influence of movement cues on intermanual interactions.Psychol Res. 2006 Jul;70(4):229-44. doi: 10.1007/s00426-005-0218-9. Epub 2005 Aug 5. Psychol Res. 2006. PMID: 16082546
-
Bimanual cross-talk during reaching movements is primarily related to response selection, not the specification of motor parameters.Psychol Res. 2003 Feb;67(1):56-70. doi: 10.1007/s00426-002-0119-0. Epub 2002 Nov 26. Psychol Res. 2003. PMID: 12589450 Clinical Trial.
-
Target selection during bimanual reaching to direct cues is unaffected by the perceptual similarity of the targets.J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2007 Oct;33(5):1107-16. doi: 10.1037/0096-1523.33.5.1107. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2007. PMID: 17924810
-
Bimanual reaches with symbolic cues exhibit errors in target selection.Exp Brain Res. 2011 Aug;212(4):541-54. doi: 10.1007/s00221-011-2762-4. Epub 2011 Jun 18. Exp Brain Res. 2011. PMID: 21687986
Cited by
-
Response biases: the influence of the contralateral limb and head position.Exp Brain Res. 2019 Dec;237(12):3253-3264. doi: 10.1007/s00221-019-05667-z. Epub 2019 Oct 24. Exp Brain Res. 2019. PMID: 31650213
-
The Representation of Action: Insights From Bimanual Coordination.Curr Dir Psychol Sci. 2008;17(2):130-135. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8721.2008.00562.x. Curr Dir Psychol Sci. 2008. PMID: 19606276 Free PMC article.
-
Shifts of the point-of-change can be attributed to a lower mechanical cost of motor execution.Exp Brain Res. 2020 May;238(5):1097-1105. doi: 10.1007/s00221-020-05781-3. Epub 2020 Mar 26. Exp Brain Res. 2020. PMID: 32219475 Free PMC article.
-
The Psychology of Reaching: Action Selection, Movement Implementation, and Sensorimotor Learning.Annu Rev Psychol. 2021 Jan 4;72:61-95. doi: 10.1146/annurev-psych-010419-051053. Epub 2020 Sep 25. Annu Rev Psychol. 2021. PMID: 32976728 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Haptic feedback helps bipedal coordination.Exp Brain Res. 2016 Oct;234(10):2869-81. doi: 10.1007/s00221-016-4689-2. Epub 2016 Jun 4. Exp Brain Res. 2016. PMID: 27263085 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
