Chest imaging with flat-panel detector at low and standard doses: comparison with storage phosphor technology in normal patients

Eur Radiol. 2002 Feb;12(2):385-90. doi: 10.1007/s00330-001-1166-4. Epub 2001 Nov 13.

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the performance of standard-dose and low-dose cesium iodide (CsI)-doted amorphous silicon (a-Si) flat-panel detector technology (FDT) as compared with storage-phosphor technology (SPT) in the depiction of relevant anatomical structures in chest radiography. In 75 patients referred for thoracic CT, digital chest radiographs were randomly obtained with either SPT at a standard dose (speed class S400, n=25), standard-dose FDT (S400, n=25) or FDT at a low dose (S800, n=25). Five radiologists evaluated the visibility of eight pulmonary and mediastinal anatomical structures using a five-point rating scale. To determine statistically significant differences between the three groups, the Mann-Whitney U-test was employed. No statistically significant differences were found in the depiction of eight criteria between SPT and standard-dose or low-dose FDT chest radiographs. The performance of FDT S400 was equal to SPT for most criteria and better for retrocardiac structures and soft tissue. FDT S800 was inferior to both SPT and FDT S400. Standard-dose FDT is equivalent to SPT in the depiction of relevant anatomical structures of the chest. Our results also indicate that a dose reduction of 50% with FDT may result in small but not significant decrease of image quality.

Publication types

  • Clinical Trial
  • Comparative Study
  • Randomized Controlled Trial

MeSH terms

  • Cesium
  • Female
  • Humans
  • Iodides
  • Male
  • Middle Aged
  • Phosphorus
  • Radiographic Image Enhancement / methods*
  • Radiography, Thoracic / methods*
  • X-Ray Intensifying Screens*

Substances

  • Iodides
  • Cesium
  • Phosphorus
  • cesium iodide