Evaluation of low-energy extracorporeal shock-wave application for treatment of chronic plantar fasciitis
- PMID: 11886900
- DOI: 10.2106/00004623-200203000-00001
Evaluation of low-energy extracorporeal shock-wave application for treatment of chronic plantar fasciitis
Abstract
Background: Although the application of low-energy extracorporeal shock waves to treat musculoskeletal disorders is controversial, there has been some limited, short-term evidence of its effectiveness for the treatment of chronic plantar fasciitis.
Methods: From 1993 to 1995, a prospective, two-tailed, randomized, controlled, observer-blinded pilot trial was performed to assess whether three applications of 1000 impulses of low-energy shock waves (Group I) led to a superior clinical outcome when compared with three applications of ten impulses of low-energy shock waves (Group II) in patients with intractable plantar heel pain. The sample size was 112. The main outcome measure was patient satisfaction according to a four-step score (excellent, good, acceptable, and poor) at six months. Secondary outcome measures were patient satisfaction according to the four-step score at five years and the severity of pain on manual pressure, at night, and at rest as well as the ability to walk without pain at six months and five years.
Results: At six months, the rate of good and excellent outcomes according to the four-step score was significantly (47%) better (p < 0.0001) in Group I than in Group II. As assessed on a visual analog scale, the score for pain caused by manual pressure at six months had decreased to 19 points, from 77 points before treatment, in Group I, whereas in Group II the ratings before treatment and at six months were 79 and 77 points (p < 0.0001 for the difference between groups). In Group I, twenty-five of forty-nine patients were able to walk completely without pain at six months compared with zero of forty-eight patients in Group II (p < 0.0001). By five years, the difference in the rates of good and excellent outcomes according to the four-step score was only 11% in favor of Group I (p = 0.071) because of a high rate of good and excellent results from subsequent surgery in Group II; the score for pain caused by manual pressure had decreased to 9 points in Group I and to 29 points in Group II (p = 0.0006 for the difference between groups). At five years, five (13%) of thirty-eight patients in Group I had undergone an operation of the heel compared with twenty-three (58%) of forty patients in Group II (p < 0.0001).
Conclusions: Three treatments with 1000 impulses of low-energy shock waves appear to be an effective therapy for plantar fasciitis and may help the patient to avoid surgery for recalcitrant heel pain. In contrast, three applications of ten impulses did not improve symptoms substantially.
Comment in
-
Low-energy extracorporeal shock-wave therapy for chronic plantar fasciitis.Clin J Sport Med. 2003 Jan;13(1):64. doi: 10.1097/00042752-200301000-00016. Clin J Sport Med. 2003. PMID: 12749302 No abstract available.
Similar articles
-
Shock wave application for chronic plantar fasciitis in running athletes. A prospective, randomized, placebo-controlled trial.Am J Sports Med. 2003 Mar-Apr;31(2):268-75. doi: 10.1177/03635465030310021901. Am J Sports Med. 2003. PMID: 12642264 Clinical Trial.
-
Ultrasound-guided extracorporeal shock wave therapy for plantar fasciitis: a randomized controlled trial.JAMA. 2002 Sep 18;288(11):1364-72. doi: 10.1001/jama.288.11.1364. JAMA. 2002. PMID: 12234230 Clinical Trial.
-
Extracorporeal shockwave therapy (ESWT) in patients with chronic proximal plantar fasciitis.Foot Ankle Int. 2002 Apr;23(4):309-13. doi: 10.1177/107110070202300403. Foot Ankle Int. 2002. PMID: 11991475 Clinical Trial.
-
Effectiveness of Extracorporeal Shock Wave Therapy Without Local Anesthesia in Patients With Recalcitrant Plantar Fasciitis: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 2017 Aug;96(8):529-534. doi: 10.1097/PHM.0000000000000666. Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 2017. PMID: 27977431 Review.
-
Diagnosing and treating plantar fasciitis: a conservative approach to plantar heel pain.Cleve Clin J Med. 1999 Apr;66(4):231-5. doi: 10.3949/ccjm.66.4.231. Cleve Clin J Med. 1999. PMID: 10199059 Review.
Cited by
-
Biological response of extracorporeal shock wave therapy to tendinopathy in vivo (review).Front Vet Sci. 2022 Jul 22;9:851894. doi: 10.3389/fvets.2022.851894. eCollection 2022. Front Vet Sci. 2022. PMID: 35942112 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Molecular Mechanisms Underlying the Pain-Relieving Effects of Extracorporeal Shock Wave Therapy: A Focus on Fascia Nociceptors.Life (Basel). 2022 May 17;12(5):743. doi: 10.3390/life12050743. Life (Basel). 2022. PMID: 35629410 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Superior pedal function recovery of newly designed three spike insole over total contact insole in refractory plantar fasciitis: A randomized, double-blinded, non-inferiority study.PLoS One. 2021 Jul 23;16(7):e0255064. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0255064. eCollection 2021. PLoS One. 2021. PMID: 34297721 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
Effectiveness of extra-corporeal shock wave therapy (ESWT) vs methylprednisolone injections in plantar fasciitis.J Clin Orthop Trauma. 2019 Mar-Apr;10(2):401-405. doi: 10.1016/j.jcot.2018.02.011. Epub 2018 Feb 23. J Clin Orthop Trauma. 2019. PMID: 30828215 Free PMC article.
-
Comparative effectiveness of extracorporeal shock wave, ultrasound, low-level laser therapy, noninvasive interactive neurostimulation, and pulsed radiofrequency treatment for treating plantar fasciitis: A systematic review and network meta-analysis.Medicine (Baltimore). 2018 Oct;97(43):e12819. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000012819. Medicine (Baltimore). 2018. PMID: 30412072 Free PMC article. Review.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Research Materials
