Skip to main page content
Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
, 30 (5), 1146-51

Lessons From Everyday Lives: A Moral Justification for Acute Care Research

Affiliations

Lessons From Everyday Lives: A Moral Justification for Acute Care Research

Andrew D McRae et al. Crit Care Med.

Abstract

Progress in emergency and critical care requires that clinical research be performed on patients who are incapable of granting consent for research participation. Analyses of the ethics of such research have left some questions incompletely answered. Why should we be permitted to expose vulnerable patients to research risks without their consent? In particular, how do we justify research interventions that have no potential benefit for participants (nontherapeutic interventions)? This article presents a moral justification for nontherapeutic interventions in emergency research. By relying on a framework for assessing research risks, and by drawing on the example of pediatric research, this justification is founded in how institutional review boards, and society in general, analyze risk. Our justification for emergency research also suggests additional protections for emergency research participants, including a stringent threshold for research risk, that still permit important research to proceed.

Comment in

Similar articles

See all similar articles

Cited by 12 PubMed Central articles

See all "Cited by" articles

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources

Feedback