Bone marrow-derived APCs present both parenchymal-self and pathogen-derived Ags in a manner that elicits either T cell tolerization or immunity, respectively. To study the parameters that confer tolerogenic vs immunogenic APC function we used an adoptive transfer system in which naive TCR transgenic hemagglutinin (HA)-specific CD4(+) T cells are either tolerized upon encountering HA expressed constitutively as a parenchymal self-Ag (self-HA) or primed to express effector function upon encountering transiently expressed vaccinia-derived HA (viral-HA). When the duration of viral-HA presentation was extended for the period required to elicit tolerization toward self-HA, CD4 cell tolerization to viral-HA did not occur. Furthermore, CD4 cells exhibited both phenotypic as well as functional differences during early stages of tolerization and priming, suggesting that these divergent differentiation processes are programmed soon after the initial APC-CD4 cell interaction. When mice expressing self-HA were infected with an irrelevant vaccinia, CD4 cell tolerization still occurred, indicating that priming vs tolerization cannot be explained by pathogen-induced third parties (i.e., non-APCs) that act directly on CD4 cells. Taken together, these results suggest that CD4 cell tolerization to parenchymal self-Ags and priming to pathogen-derived Ags are initiated by functionally distinct APCs.