Prophylactic oophorectomy in carriers of BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutations
- PMID: 12023993
- DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa012158
Prophylactic oophorectomy in carriers of BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutations
Abstract
Background: Data concerning the efficacy of bilateral prophylactic oophorectomy for reducing the risk of gynecologic cancer in women with BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutations are limited. We investigated whether this procedure reduces the risk of cancers of the coelomic epithelium and breast in women who carry such mutations.
Methods: A total of 551 women with disease-associated germ-line BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutations were identified from registries and studied for the occurrence of ovarian and breast cancer. We determined the incidence of ovarian cancer in 259 women who had undergone bilateral prophylactic oophorectomy and in 292 matched controls who had not undergone the procedure. In a subgroup of 241 women with no history of breast cancer or prophylactic mastectomy, the incidence of breast cancer was determined in 99 women who had undergone bilateral prophylactic oophorectomy and in 142 matched controls. The length of postoperative follow-up for both groups was at least eight years.
Results: Six women who underwent prophylactic oophorectomy (2.3 percent) received a diagnosis of stage I ovarian cancer at the time of the procedure; two women (0.8 percent) received a diagnosis of papillary serous peritoneal carcinoma 3.8 and 8.6 years after bilateral prophylactic oophorectomy. Among the controls, 58 women (19.9 percent) received a diagnosis of ovarian cancer, after a mean follow-up of 8.8 years. With the exclusion of the six women whose cancer was diagnosed at surgery, prophylactic oophorectomy significantly reduced the risk of coelomic epithelial cancer (hazard ratio, 0.04; 95 percent confidence interval, 0.01 to 0.16). Of 99 women who underwent bilateral prophylactic oophorectomy and who were studied to determine the risk of breast cancer, breast cancer developed in 21 (21.2 percent), as compared with 60 (42.3 percent) in the control group (hazard ratio, 0.47; 95 percent confidence interval, 0.29 to 0.77).
Conclusions: Bilateral prophylactic oophorectomy reduces the risk of coelomic epithelial cancer and breast cancer in women with BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutations.
Comment in
-
Prophylactic oophorectomy to reduce the risk of ovarian and breast cancer in carriers of BRCA mutations.N Engl J Med. 2002 May 23;346(21):1660-2. doi: 10.1056/NEJMed020044. Epub 2002 May 20. N Engl J Med. 2002. PMID: 12024000 No abstract available.
-
Oophorectomy in carriers of BRCA mutations.N Engl J Med. 2002 Sep 26;347(13):1037-40; author reply 1037-40. N Engl J Med. 2002. PMID: 12353511 No abstract available.
-
Oophorectomy in carriers of BRCA mutations.N Engl J Med. 2002 Sep 26;347(13):1037-40; author reply 1037-40. N Engl J Med. 2002. PMID: 12353512 No abstract available.
Similar articles
-
Risk-reducing salpingo-oophorectomy in women with a BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutation.N Engl J Med. 2002 May 23;346(21):1609-15. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa020119. Epub 2002 May 20. N Engl J Med. 2002. PMID: 12023992
-
Intra-abdominal carcinomatosis after prophylactic oophorectomy in women of hereditary breast ovarian cancer syndrome kindreds associated with BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutations.Gynecol Oncol. 2005 May;97(2):457-67. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2005.01.039. Gynecol Oncol. 2005. PMID: 15863145
-
Bilateral prophylactic mastectomy reduces breast cancer risk in BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation carriers: the PROSE Study Group.J Clin Oncol. 2004 Mar 15;22(6):1055-62. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2004.04.188. Epub 2004 Feb 23. J Clin Oncol. 2004. PMID: 14981104
-
Prophylactic oophorectomy in BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation carriers.J Clin Oncol. 2000 Nov 1;18(21 Suppl):100S-3S. J Clin Oncol. 2000. PMID: 11060335 Review.
-
Prophylactic oophorectomy in women at increased cancer risk.Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol. 2007 Feb;19(1):27-30. doi: 10.1097/GCO.0b013e32801195da. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol. 2007. PMID: 17218848 Review.
Cited by
-
Incidental finding of a BRCA2 variant following whole genome sequencing to molecularly diagnose bilateral congenital cataracts.BMJ Case Rep. 2024 Oct 11;17(10):e260755. doi: 10.1136/bcr-2024-260755. BMJ Case Rep. 2024. PMID: 39395831
-
Hereditary Cancer Genetic Testing: 30 Years of Impact on Cancer Care.Dela J Public Health. 2024 Aug 28;10(3):16-20. doi: 10.32481/djph.2024.08.06. eCollection 2024 Aug. Dela J Public Health. 2024. PMID: 39211401 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
-
Cutting-edge Treatment for Gynecological Malignancies.Juntendo Iji Zasshi. 2023 Mar 29;69(2):86-91. doi: 10.14789/jmj.JMJ22-0044-R. eCollection 2023. Juntendo Iji Zasshi. 2023. PMID: 38854450 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Cascade genetic testing: an underutilized pathway to equitable cancer care?Fam Cancer. 2024 Jun;23(2):141-145. doi: 10.1007/s10689-024-00367-2. Epub 2024 May 15. Fam Cancer. 2024. PMID: 38748383 Review.
-
Role of Breast Cancer Risk Estimation Models to Identify Women Eligible for Genetic Testing and Risk-Reducing Surgery.Biomedicines. 2024 Mar 22;12(4):714. doi: 10.3390/biomedicines12040714. Biomedicines. 2024. PMID: 38672070 Free PMC article. Review.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical
Miscellaneous