Nonspatial attentional shifts between audition and vision
- PMID: 12075893
- DOI: 10.1037//0096-1523.28.3.628
Nonspatial attentional shifts between audition and vision
Abstract
This study investigated nonspatial shifts of attention between visual and auditory modalities. The authors provide evidence that the modality of a stimulus (S1) affected the processing of a subsequent stimulus (S2) depending on whether they shared the same modality. For both vision and audition, the onset of S1 summoned attention exogenously to its modality, causing a delay in processing S2 in a different modality. That undermines the notion that auditory stimuli have a stronger and more automatic alerting effect than visual stimuli (M. I. Posner, M. J. Nissen, & R. M. Klein, 1976). The results are consistent with other recent studies showing cross-modal attentional limitation. The authors suggest that such cross-modal limitation can be produced by simply presenting S1 and S2 in different modalities and that central processing mechanisms are also, at least partially, modality dependent.
Similar articles
-
The modality shift effect and the effectiveness of warning signals in different modalities.Acta Psychol (Amst). 2005 Oct;120(2):199-226. doi: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2005.05.002. Acta Psychol (Amst). 2005. PMID: 15993828
-
Space-independent modality-driven attentional capture in auditory, tactile and visual systems.Exp Brain Res. 2004 Apr;155(3):301-10. doi: 10.1007/s00221-003-1724-x. Epub 2003 Dec 5. Exp Brain Res. 2004. PMID: 14658019
-
Cross-modal interactions between audition, touch, and vision in endogenous spatial attention: ERP evidence on preparatory states and sensory modulations.J Cogn Neurosci. 2002 Feb 15;14(2):254-71. doi: 10.1162/089892902317236885. J Cogn Neurosci. 2002. PMID: 11970790
-
Cross-modal nonspatial repetition inhibition.Atten Percept Psychophys. 2012 Jul;74(5):867-78. doi: 10.3758/s13414-012-0289-9. Atten Percept Psychophys. 2012. PMID: 22415447
-
Cross-modal links in spatial attention.Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 1998 Aug 29;353(1373):1319-31. doi: 10.1098/rstb.1998.0286. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 1998. PMID: 9770225 Free PMC article. Review.
Cited by
-
Comparing auditory and visual aspects of multisensory working memory using bimodally matched feature patterns.bioRxiv [Preprint]. 2023 Dec 6:2023.08.03.551865. doi: 10.1101/2023.08.03.551865. bioRxiv. 2023. PMID: 37577481 Free PMC article. Preprint.
-
Levels of neuroticism can predict attentional performance during cross-modal nonspatial repetition inhibition.Atten Percept Psychophys. 2022 Nov;84(8):2552-2561. doi: 10.3758/s13414-022-02583-3. Epub 2022 Oct 17. Atten Percept Psychophys. 2022. PMID: 36253587
-
Less is more: Removing a modality of an expected olfactory-visual stimulation enhances brain activation.Hum Brain Mapp. 2022 Jun 1;43(8):2567-2581. doi: 10.1002/hbm.25806. Epub 2022 Feb 10. Hum Brain Mapp. 2022. PMID: 35142405 Free PMC article.
-
Aging Increases Cross-Modal Distraction by Unexpected Sounds: Controlling for Response Speed.Front Aging Neurosci. 2021 Sep 15;13:733388. doi: 10.3389/fnagi.2021.733388. eCollection 2021. Front Aging Neurosci. 2021. PMID: 34603010 Free PMC article.
-
Principles of Integrated Cognitive Training for Executive Attention: Application to an Instrumental Skill.Front Psychol. 2021 Jun 22;12:647749. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.647749. eCollection 2021. Front Psychol. 2021. PMID: 34239477 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
