American Society of Neuroradiology research survey 2001

Acad Radiol. 2002 Jul;9(7):810-4. doi: 10.1016/s1076-6332(03)80353-7.

Abstract

Rationale and objectives: Research is a critical component of the mission of academic radiology, and success in research is necessary for the future of neuroradiology. Thus, the authors set out to establish a baseline of research activities of American Society of Neuroradiology (ASNR) members.

Materials and methods: The authors surveyed 100 fellowship program directors. The survey was Web based, with recruitment from the ASNR Fellowship Database survey site and with e-mail and fax solicitations to the Web site. Questions focused on neuroradiologist and neuroradiology fellow involvement in research.

Results: Forty-eight of the 100 program directors (48%) responded. Several key findings emerged: (a) About one-third of fellowship programs require all fellows to do some research, with most fellows receiving less than 1 day per week of academic time; (b) just over half of the programs expect fellows to publish a paper; (c) about two-thirds of academic neuroradiologists get at least 1 academic day per week; (d) most academic neuroradiologists perform research, but most of this research is unfunded; and (e) about nine of 10 academic sections have at least one neuroradiologist with some extramural funding.

Conclusion: The relative lack of extramural funding among academic neuroradiologists is a reality that is probably multifactorial; however, there may be a direct relationship between amount of academic time free from clinical duties and successful competition for funding. The time (and, thus, financial) support of research-oriented fellows and faculty should be increased.

MeSH terms

  • Canada
  • Data Collection
  • Fellowships and Scholarships
  • Humans
  • Neurology*
  • Radiology*
  • Research / economics
  • Research / statistics & numerical data*
  • Research Support as Topic
  • Societies, Medical
  • United States