Regulating acute posttrauma distress

J Burn Care Rehabil. 2002 Jul-Aug;23(4):249-57. doi: 10.1097/00004630-200207000-00005.

Abstract

The influence of emotion-approach and emotion-avoidance methods of coping on the development (cohort 1) and persistence (cohort 2) of posttraumatic stress symptoms was examined. The two coping methods and the frequency and intensity of intrusive, avoidant, and hyperarousal symptoms were assessed in separate series of 71 and 94 hospitalized acute burn-injured patients. In both samples, subjects who frequently used both mental distancing (emotion-avoidance) and venting emotions (emotion-approach), relative to subjects who used only one or neither of the two coping methods, had higher levels of posttraumatic stress disorder symptoms even when controlling for baseline symptoms. Higgins' (1997) motivational framework, incorporating the needs for controllability and predictability, and Wegner's (1994) theory of mental control are used to interpret the findings.

Publication types

  • Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
  • Research Support, U.S. Gov't, Non-P.H.S.
  • Research Support, U.S. Gov't, P.H.S.

MeSH terms

  • Adaptation, Psychological*
  • Adult
  • Burns / complications*
  • Burns / psychology*
  • Cohort Studies
  • Emotions*
  • Female
  • Humans
  • Internal-External Control*
  • Male
  • Motivation
  • Stress Disorders, Post-Traumatic / etiology
  • Stress Disorders, Post-Traumatic / prevention & control*
  • Stress Disorders, Post-Traumatic / psychology