Comparison of two T-classification systems for sino-nasal carcinoma

Clin Otolaryngol Allied Sci. 2002 Aug;27(4):254-9. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2273.2002.00572.x.

Abstract

It is often difficult to determine the actual site of origin of tumours originating in the sino-nasal region, and a uniform classification system that covers all tumours in this area is warranted. A retrospective series of 165 consecutive patients with sino-nasal carcinoma, treated and followed at the Aarhus University Hospital between 1963 and 1991, was evaluated and T-staged according to the Lederman classification. The 80 maxillary antrum carcinomas were also staged according to the UICC 1997 system. In univariate analysis, the UICC T-classification was prognostic for locoregional tumour control and disease-specific survival. However, when adjusted for covariates (gender and nodal involvement) in a multivariate analysis, the UICC classification was not a significant independent prognostic parameter. In contrast, the Lederman T-classification was prognostic both in univariate and multivariate analysis. The Lederman T-classification was more prognostic for locoregional control and disease-specific survival than the UICC TNM classification. In addition, the Lederman classification is easy to use and has a broader applicability as it covers all sites in the sino-nasal area.

Publication types

  • Comparative Study

MeSH terms

  • Adenocarcinoma / classification
  • Adenocarcinoma / pathology
  • Adult
  • Aged
  • Aged, 80 and over
  • Carcinoma / classification*
  • Carcinoma / pathology
  • Carcinoma, Squamous Cell / classification
  • Carcinoma, Squamous Cell / pathology
  • Female
  • Humans
  • Male
  • Middle Aged
  • Multivariate Analysis
  • Nose Neoplasms / classification*
  • Nose Neoplasms / pathology
  • Paranasal Sinus Neoplasms / classification*
  • Paranasal Sinus Neoplasms / pathology
  • Prognosis