Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Clinical Trial
. 2002 Aug 10;325(7359):299.
doi: 10.1136/bmj.325.7359.299.

Suturing versus conservative management of lacerations of the hand: randomised controlled trial

James Quinn  1 , Steven Cummings, Michael Callaham, Karen Sellers
Affiliations
Clinical Trial

Suturing versus conservative management of lacerations of the hand: randomised controlled trial

James Quinn et al. BMJ. .

Abstract

Objective: To assess the difference in clinical outcome between lacerations of the hand closed with sutures and those treated conservatively.

Design: Randomised controlled trial.

Setting: Emergency department in a tertiary hospital.

Participants: Consecutive patients presenting between 16 February and 30 November 2000 with uncomplicated lacerations of the hand (full thickness <2 cm; without tendon, joint, fracture, or nerve complications) who would normally require sutures. 154 patients were eligible, 58 refused, and 5 were missed; 91 patients with 95 lacerations were enrolled.

Intervention: Participants were randomised to suturing or conservative treatment.

Main outcome measures: Primary outcome was cosmetic appearance after three months, rated on a previously validated visual analogue scale. Duration of treatment, pain during treatment, patients' assessment of their outcome, and the time for patients to resume normal activities were also measured.

Results: Participants treated with sutures and those treated conservatively did not differ significantly in the assessment of cosmetic appearance by independent blinded doctors after three months: 83 mm v 80 mm, (mean difference 3 (95% confidence interval -1 to 8) mm) on the visual analogue scale. The mean time to resume normal activities was the same in both groups (3.4 days). Patients treated conservatively had less pain (difference 18 (12 to 24) mm) and treatment time was 14 (10 to 18) min shorter.

Conclusion: Similar cosmetic and functional outcomes result from either conservative treatment or suturing of small uncomplicated lacerations of the hand, but conservative treatment is faster and less painful.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure
Figure
Selection of patients and allocation of treatment
See this image and copyright information in PMC

Comment in

Similar articles

See all similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Singer AJ, Hollander JE, Quinn JV. Evaluation and management of traumatic lacerations. N Engl J Med. 1997;337:1142–1148. - PubMed
    1. Carrico TJ, Mehrof AI, Cohen IK. Biology of wound healing. Surg Clin N Am. 1984;64:721–733. - PubMed
    1. Singer AJ, Clark RAF. Cutaneous wound healing. N Engl J Med. 1999;341:738–745. - PubMed
    1. Lehmann L, Lanz U. [The “open-palm” technique in the treatment of Dupuytren's contracture] Handchirurgie. 1977;9:7–10. . (In German.) - PubMed
    1. Huskisson EC. Visual analog scales. In: Melzack R, editor. Pain measurement and assessment. New York: Raven; 1983. pp. 33–37.

Publication types