Does order and timing in performance of imagined and actual movements affect the motor imagery process? The duration of walking and writing task
- PMID: 12191807
- DOI: 10.1016/s0166-4328(02)00030-x
Does order and timing in performance of imagined and actual movements affect the motor imagery process? The duration of walking and writing task
Abstract
The purpose of the present study was to investigate the effects on the duration of imagined movements of changes in timing and order of performance of actual and imagined movement. Two groups of subjects had to actually execute and imagine a walking and a writing task. The first group first executed 10 trials of the actual movements (block A) and then imagined the same movements at different intervals: immediately after actual movements (block I-1) and after 25 min (I-2), 50 min (I-3) and 75 min (I-4) interval. The second group first imagined and then actually executed the tasks. The duration of actual and imagined movements, recorded by means of an electronic stopwatch operated by the subjects, was analysed. The duration of imagined movements was very similar to those of actual movements, for both tasks, regardless of either the interval elapsed from the actual movements (first group) or the order of performance (second group). However, the variability of imagined movement duration was significantly increased compared to variability of the actual movements, for both motor tasks and groups. The findings give evidence of similar cognitive processes underlying both imagination and actual performance of movement.
Copyright 2002 Elsevier Science B.V.
Similar articles
-
Imagined and actual arm movements have similar durations when performed under different conditions of direction and mass.Exp Brain Res. 2002 Apr;143(4):447-52. doi: 10.1007/s00221-002-1012-1. Epub 2002 Feb 16. Exp Brain Res. 2002. PMID: 11914790
-
A prolonged motor imagery session alter imagined and actual movement durations: Potential implications for neurorehabilitation.Behav Brain Res. 2016 Jan 15;297:67-75. doi: 10.1016/j.bbr.2015.09.036. Epub 2015 Sep 30. Behav Brain Res. 2016. PMID: 26431764
-
Evidence for motor simulation in imagined locomotion.J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2009 Oct;35(5):1458-71. doi: 10.1037/a0015786. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2009. PMID: 19803649
-
Duration of mentally simulated movement: a review.J Mot Behav. 2005 Jan;37(1):10-20. doi: 10.3200/JMBR.37.1.10-20. J Mot Behav. 2005. PMID: 15642689 Review.
-
Internal simulation of expected sensory experiences before movements get started.Rev Neurosci. 2003;14(4):387-99. doi: 10.1515/revneuro.2003.14.4.387. Rev Neurosci. 2003. PMID: 14640322 Review.
Cited by
-
Action-specific influences on distance perception: a role for motor simulation.J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2008 Dec;34(6):1479-92. doi: 10.1037/a0010781. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2008. PMID: 19045987 Free PMC article.
-
Motor transfer from map ocular exploration to locomotion during spatial navigation from memory.Exp Brain Res. 2013 Feb;224(4):605-11. doi: 10.1007/s00221-012-3336-9. Epub 2012 Dec 7. Exp Brain Res. 2013. PMID: 23223779
-
The comparison between motor imagery and verbal rehearsal on the learning of sequential movements.Front Hum Neurosci. 2013 Nov 18;7:773. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2013.00773. eCollection 2013. Front Hum Neurosci. 2013. PMID: 24302905 Free PMC article.
-
Characterization of kinesthetic motor imagery compared with visual motor imageries.Sci Rep. 2021 Feb 12;11(1):3751. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-82241-0. Sci Rep. 2021. PMID: 33580093 Free PMC article.
-
Benefits of Motor Imagery for Human Space Flight: A Brief Review of Current Knowledge and Future Applications.Front Physiol. 2019 Apr 11;10:396. doi: 10.3389/fphys.2019.00396. eCollection 2019. Front Physiol. 2019. PMID: 31031635 Free PMC article. Review.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
