Skip to main page content
Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Multicenter Study
, 72 (4), 438-52

The Impact of the CYP2D6 Polymorphism on Haloperidol Pharmacokinetics and on the Outcome of Haloperidol Treatment

Multicenter Study

The Impact of the CYP2D6 Polymorphism on Haloperidol Pharmacokinetics and on the Outcome of Haloperidol Treatment

Jürgen Brockmöller et al. Clin Pharmacol Ther.


Objectives: The genetically polymorphic enzyme cytochrome P450 (CYP) 2D6 contributes to the biotransformation of the antipsychotic drug haloperidol. The impact of the polymorphism on haloperidol pharmacokinetics, adverse events, and efficacy was prospectively evaluated under naturalistic conditions in 172 unselected psychiatric inpatients with acute psychotic symptoms.

Methods: Serum trough levels of haloperidol and reduced haloperidol of patients receiving clinically adjusted doses were analyzed on days 3, 14, and 28 after hospital admission. Adverse events such as extrapyramidal symptoms were assessed by standardized rating scales. Efficacy was documented by recording the change in positive and negative schizophrenic symptoms. These parameters were correlated with the CYP2D6 genotype determined by polymerase chain reaction analysis for alleles *1 to *15 and *17.

Results: The serum concentrations showed wide interindividual variation. Reduced haloperidol trough levels and haloperidol total clearance correlated significantly with the number of active CYP2D6 genes. In addition, body weight and smoking had significant effects on haloperidol kinetics, whereas age, gender, and comedication showed only slight effects. The ratings for pseudoparkinsonism were significantly higher in poor metabolizers of substrates of CYP2D6. On the other hand, there was a trend toward lower therapeutic efficacy with increasing number of active CYP2D6 genes.

Conclusions: Treatment with haloperidol should be avoided in extremely slow and extremely rapid metabolizers of CYP2D6 substrates. Both genotyping and blood concentration measurement explained only a fraction of the adverse events; about 20 patients would have to be genotyped to achieve a significant benefit in 1 patient. It is interesting that genotyping was at least as good a predictor of adverse events as the measured drug concentrations.

Similar articles

See all similar articles

Cited by 34 PubMed Central articles

See all "Cited by" articles

Publication types

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources