Skip to main page content
Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2002 Oct;187(4):824-8.
doi: 10.1067/mob.2002.127142.

Reassessing the Labor Curve in Nulliparous Women

Affiliations

Reassessing the Labor Curve in Nulliparous Women

Jun Zhang et al. Am J Obstet Gynecol. .

Abstract

Objectives: Our purpose was to examine the pattern of labor progression in nulliparous parturients in contemporary obstetric practice.

Study design: We extracted detailed labor data from 1329 nulliparous parturients with a term, singleton, vertex fetus of normal birth weight after spontaneous onset of labor. Cesarean deliveries were excluded. We used a repeated-measures regression with a 10th-order polynomial function to discover the average labor curve under contemporary practice. With use of an interval-censored regression with a log normal distribution, we also computed the expected time interval of the cervix to reach the next centimeter, the expected rate of cervical dilation at each phase of labor, and the duration of labor for fetal descent at various stations.

Results: Our average labor curve differs markedly from the Friedman curve. The cervix dilated substantially slower in the active phase. It took approximately 5.5 hours from 4 cm to 10 cm, compared with 2.5 hours under the Friedman curve. We observed no deceleration phase. Before 7 cm, no perceivable change in cervical dilation for more than 2 hour was not uncommon. The 5th percentiles of rate of cervical dilation were all below 1 cm per hour. The 95th percentile of time interval for fetal descent from station +1/3 to +2/3 was 3 hours at the second stage.

Conclusion: Our results suggest that the pattern of labor progression in contemporary practice differs significantly from the Friedman curve. The diagnostic criteria for protraction and arrest disorders of labor may be too stringent in nulliparous women.

Comment in

  • Zhang's guideline to assess labour progression.
    Grylka-Baeschlin S, Devane D. Grylka-Baeschlin S, et al. Lancet. 2019 Jan 26;393(10169):300-301. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(18)32274-8. Epub 2018 Dec 20. Lancet. 2019. PMID: 30581040 No abstract available.

Similar articles

See all similar articles

Cited by 44 articles

See all "Cited by" articles

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources

Feedback