Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Clinical Trial
. 2002 Oct;32(10):518-24.
doi: 10.2519/jospt.2002.32.10.518.

Comparison of static and placebo magnets on resting forearm blood flow in young, healthy men

Affiliations
Clinical Trial

Comparison of static and placebo magnets on resting forearm blood flow in young, healthy men

Gregory F Martel et al. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2002 Oct.

Abstract

Study design: Prospective, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled crossover design.

Objectives: To examine the effects of static magnets on resting forearm blood flow and vascular resistance.

Background: Despite little scientific evidence indicating benefits of wearing static magnets, recent reports have indicated a dramatic increase in the usage of magnets to treat a variety of medical conditions. Magnet manufacturers have proposed that one mechanism for pain reduction involves magnet-related blood flow alterations to the affected area.

Methods and measures: Twenty young, healthy men (mean age +/- SD = 25 +/- 2 years) wore commercially available static magnets and placebos for 30 minutes on 2 separate occasions. Resting forearm blood flow was assessed in triplicate at minutes 10, 20, and 30, using venous occlusion plethysmography. Forearm vascular resistance was estimated by dividing mean arterial pressure by blood flow.

Results: The average blood flow over the 30-minute measurement period was not significantly different between the magnet and placebo sessions (mean +/- SD for magnet session = 1.40 +/- 0.63 ml blood x 100 ml tissue(-1) x min(-1); mean +/- SD for placebo session = 1.36 +/- 0.46 ml blood x 100 ml tissue(-1) x min(-1); P = 0.66). Blood flow measurements at minutes 10, 20, and 30 were also not significantly different between the magnet and placebo sessions, and forearm vascular resistance was not different between the magnet and placebo sessions at any time (P > 0.05).

Conclusion: Exposure to static magnets for up to 30 minutes had the same effect on resting forearm blood flow and vascular resistance as placebo magnets. These data suggest that static magnets do not result in significant alterations in resting blood flow.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

  • Static magnetic field therapy: a critical review of treatment parameters.
    Colbert AP, Wahbeh H, Harling N, Connelly E, Schiffke HC, Forsten C, Gregory WL, Markov MS, Souder JJ, Elmer P, King V. Colbert AP, et al. Evid Based Complement Alternat Med. 2009 Jun;6(2):133-9. doi: 10.1093/ecam/nem131. Epub 2007 Oct 4. Evid Based Complement Alternat Med. 2009. PMID: 18955243 Free PMC article.

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources