Comparison of static and placebo magnets on resting forearm blood flow in young, healthy men
- PMID: 12403203
- DOI: 10.2519/jospt.2002.32.10.518
Comparison of static and placebo magnets on resting forearm blood flow in young, healthy men
Abstract
Study design: Prospective, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled crossover design.
Objectives: To examine the effects of static magnets on resting forearm blood flow and vascular resistance.
Background: Despite little scientific evidence indicating benefits of wearing static magnets, recent reports have indicated a dramatic increase in the usage of magnets to treat a variety of medical conditions. Magnet manufacturers have proposed that one mechanism for pain reduction involves magnet-related blood flow alterations to the affected area.
Methods and measures: Twenty young, healthy men (mean age +/- SD = 25 +/- 2 years) wore commercially available static magnets and placebos for 30 minutes on 2 separate occasions. Resting forearm blood flow was assessed in triplicate at minutes 10, 20, and 30, using venous occlusion plethysmography. Forearm vascular resistance was estimated by dividing mean arterial pressure by blood flow.
Results: The average blood flow over the 30-minute measurement period was not significantly different between the magnet and placebo sessions (mean +/- SD for magnet session = 1.40 +/- 0.63 ml blood x 100 ml tissue(-1) x min(-1); mean +/- SD for placebo session = 1.36 +/- 0.46 ml blood x 100 ml tissue(-1) x min(-1); P = 0.66). Blood flow measurements at minutes 10, 20, and 30 were also not significantly different between the magnet and placebo sessions, and forearm vascular resistance was not different between the magnet and placebo sessions at any time (P > 0.05).
Conclusion: Exposure to static magnets for up to 30 minutes had the same effect on resting forearm blood flow and vascular resistance as placebo magnets. These data suggest that static magnets do not result in significant alterations in resting blood flow.
Similar articles
-
Influence of static magnetic fields on pain perception and sympathetic nerve activity in humans.J Appl Physiol (1985). 2007 Apr;102(4):1410-5. doi: 10.1152/japplphysiol.00734.2006. Epub 2006 Dec 28. J Appl Physiol (1985). 2007. PMID: 17194733 Clinical Trial.
-
Forearm plethysmography in the assessment of vascular tone and resistance vasculature design: new methodological insights.Acta Physiol (Oxf). 2006 Oct;188(2):91-101. doi: 10.1111/j.1748-1716.2006.01611.x. Acta Physiol (Oxf). 2006. PMID: 16948796
-
[Effect of pimobendan on peripheral hemodynamics].Z Kardiol. 1989 Aug;78(8):538-44. Z Kardiol. 1989. PMID: 2678794 Clinical Trial. German.
-
Static magnets for reducing pain: systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized trials.CMAJ. 2007 Sep 25;177(7):736-42. doi: 10.1503/cmaj.061344. CMAJ. 2007. PMID: 17893349 Free PMC article. Review.
-
A critical review of randomized controlled trials of static magnets for pain relief.J Altern Complement Med. 2005 Jun;11(3):495-509. doi: 10.1089/acm.2005.11.495. J Altern Complement Med. 2005. PMID: 15992236 Review.
Cited by
-
Static magnetic field therapy: a critical review of treatment parameters.Evid Based Complement Alternat Med. 2009 Jun;6(2):133-9. doi: 10.1093/ecam/nem131. Epub 2007 Oct 4. Evid Based Complement Alternat Med. 2009. PMID: 18955243 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Miscellaneous
