Improving doctors' letters

Med J Aust. 2002 Nov 4;177(9):516-20.

Abstract

Information contained in letters of referral and reply often does not meet the information needs of letter recipients. Missing reports of previous investigations and insufficient detail in the referral letter to specialists are the most serious and common problems. General practitioners prefer structured, computer-generated letters to unstructured, dictated letters. Referring surgeons and GPs identify delay in receiving the reply letter and insufficient detail as relatively common problems after a new patient consultation. They want the reply letter to describe the proposed treatment, expected outcomes and any psychosocial concerns, yet these items are often omitted. A letter content and format prompt card has the potential to enhance the quality of correspondence between medical specialists and referring doctors. Specialist medical bodies should consider preparing prompt cards (setting out preferred information content and format for letters) to distribute to their members.

Publication types

  • Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

MeSH terms

  • Correspondence as Topic*
  • Interprofessional Relations*
  • Referral and Consultation