Threshold behaviour of the maximum likelihood method in population decoding
- PMID: 12463339
Threshold behaviour of the maximum likelihood method in population decoding
Abstract
We study the performance of the maximum likelihood (ML) method in population decoding as a function of the population size. Assuming uncorrelated noise in neural responses, the ML performance, quantified by the expected square difference between the estimated and the actual quantity, follows closely the optimal Cramer-Rao bound, provided that the population size is sufficiently large. However, when the population size decreases below a certain threshold, the performance of the ML method undergoes a rapid deterioration, experiencing a large deviation from the optimal bound. We explain the cause of such threshold behaviour, and present a phenomenological approach for estimating the threshold population size, which is found to be linearly proportional to the inverse of the square of the system's signal-to-noise ratio. If the ML method is used by neural systems, we expect the number of neurons involved in population coding to be above this threshold.
Similar articles
-
Optimal short-term population coding: when Fisher information fails.Neural Comput. 2002 Oct;14(10):2317-51. doi: 10.1162/08997660260293247. Neural Comput. 2002. PMID: 12396565
-
Information processing in a neuron ensemble with the multiplicative correlation structure.Neural Netw. 2004 Mar;17(2):205-14. doi: 10.1016/j.neunet.2003.10.003. Neural Netw. 2004. PMID: 15036338
-
Optimum signal in a simple neuronal model with signal-dependent noise.Biol Cybern. 2005 Mar;92(3):199-205. doi: 10.1007/s00422-005-0545-3. Epub 2005 Mar 5. Biol Cybern. 2005. PMID: 15750866
-
Information processing with population codes.Nat Rev Neurosci. 2000 Nov;1(2):125-32. doi: 10.1038/35039062. Nat Rev Neurosci. 2000. PMID: 11252775 Review.
-
Statistical models for neural encoding, decoding, and optimal stimulus design.Prog Brain Res. 2007;165:493-507. doi: 10.1016/S0079-6123(06)65031-0. Prog Brain Res. 2007. PMID: 17925266 Review.
Cited by
-
Decoding stimulus duration from neural responses in the auditory midbrain.J Neurophysiol. 2014 Nov 15;112(10):2432-45. doi: 10.1152/jn.00360.2014. Epub 2014 Aug 13. J Neurophysiol. 2014. PMID: 25122706 Free PMC article.
-
The influence of population size, noise strength and behavioral task on best-encoded stimulus for neurons with unimodal or monotonic tuning curves.Front Comput Neurosci. 2015 Feb 17;9:18. doi: 10.3389/fncom.2015.00018. eCollection 2015. Front Comput Neurosci. 2015. PMID: 25774131 Free PMC article.
-
A signature of neural coding at human perceptual limits.J Vis. 2016 Sep 1;16(11):4. doi: 10.1167/16.11.4. J Vis. 2016. PMID: 27604067 Free PMC article.
-
Is the homunculus "aware" of sensory adaptation?Neural Comput. 2009 Dec;21(12):3271-304. doi: 10.1162/neco.2009.09-08-869. Neural Comput. 2009. PMID: 19686064 Free PMC article.
-
Adaptivity of tuning functions in a generic recurrent network model of a cortical hypercolumn.J Neurosci. 2005 Mar 30;25(13):3323-32. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.4493-04.2005. J Neurosci. 2005. PMID: 15800187 Free PMC article.