Skip to main page content
Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
, 160 (1), 4-12

Distinguishing Between the Validity and Utility of Psychiatric Diagnoses

Affiliations

Distinguishing Between the Validity and Utility of Psychiatric Diagnoses

Robert Kendell et al. Am J Psychiatry.

Abstract

Objective: The meaning of the terms "validity" and "utility" as they apply to psychiatric diagnoses is examined.

Method: The authors discuss the concepts of validity, utility, and disease; review assumptions that have been made about mental disorders as disease entities; and examine the evidence that mental disorders are separated from one another and from normality by natural boundaries (zones of rarity).

Results: Despite historical and recent assumptions to the contrary, there is little evidence that most currently recognized mental disorders are separated by natural boundaries. Researchers are increasingly assuming that variation in symptoms is continuous and are therefore questioning the validity of contemporary classifications.

Conclusions: It is important to distinguish between validity and utility in considering psychiatric diagnoses. Diagnostic categories defined by their syndromes should be regarded as valid only if they have been shown to be discrete entities with natural boundaries that separate them from other disorders. Although most diagnostic concepts have not been shown to be valid in this sense, many possess high utility by virtue of the information about outcome, treatment response, and etiology that they convey. They are therefore invaluable working concepts for clinicians.

Similar articles

  • Psychiatric Classifications: Validity and Utility
    A Jablensky. World Psychiatry 15 (1), 26-31. PMID 26833601.
    Despite historical assumptions to the contrary, there is little evidence that the majority of recognized mental disorders are separated by natural boundaries. Diagnostic …
  • [The Importance of Classifications in Psychiatry]
    T Lempérière. Encephale 21 Spec No 5, 3-7. PMID 8582303. - Review
    The classifications currently used in psychiatry have different aims: to facilitate communication between researchers and clinicians at national and international levels …
  • DSM-IV: Empirical Guidelines From Psychometrics
    RO Nelson-Gray. J Abnorm Psychol 100 (3), 308-15. PMID 1918610. - Review
    This commentary addresses the use of psychometric theory and methodology in the development of the 4th edition of the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorder …
  • Metaphorical Analysis of Psychiatric Classification as a Psychological Test
    RK Blashfield et al. J Abnorm Psychol 100 (3), 262-70. PMID 1918603. - Review
    In this taxonomic article we explore the metaphor of comparing a psychiatric classification to a psychological test. Structurally, diagnostic criteria are like test items …
  • Toward DSM-V and the Classification of Psychopathology
    TA Widiger et al. Psychol Bull 126 (6), 946-63. PMID 11107884. - Review
    The Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM-IV) developed by the American Psychiatric Association (1994) is a compelling effort at a best approximation …
See all similar articles

Cited by 173 PubMed Central articles

See all "Cited by" articles

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources

Feedback