Associative knowledge controls deployment of visual selective attention
- PMID: 12514738
- DOI: 10.1038/nn996
Associative knowledge controls deployment of visual selective attention
Abstract
According to some models of visual selective attention, objects in a scene activate corresponding neural representations, which compete for perceptual awareness and motor behavior. During a visual search for a target object, top-down control exerted by working memory representations of the target's defining properties resolves competition in favor of the target. These models, however, ignore the existence of associative links among object representations. Here we show that such associations can strongly influence deployment of attention in humans. In the context of visual search, objects associated with the target were both recalled more often and recognized more accurately than unrelated distractors. Notably, both target and associated objects competitively weakened recognition of unrelated distractors and slowed responses to a luminance probe. Moreover, in a speeded search protocol, associated objects rendered search both slower and less accurate. Finally, the first saccades after onset of the stimulus array were more often directed toward associated than control items.
Similar articles
-
View-invariant object category learning, recognition, and search: how spatial and object attention are coordinated using surface-based attentional shrouds.Cogn Psychol. 2009 Feb;58(1):1-48. doi: 10.1016/j.cogpsych.2008.05.001. Epub 2008 Jul 23. Cogn Psychol. 2009. PMID: 18653176 Review.
-
Prior experience of rotation is not required for recognizing objects seen from different angles.Nat Neurosci. 2005 Dec;8(12):1768-75. doi: 10.1038/nn1600. Epub 2005 Nov 20. Nat Neurosci. 2005. PMID: 16299500
-
Object representations maintain attentional control settings across space and time.Cognition. 2009 Oct;113(1):111-6. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2009.06.016. Epub 2009 Aug 13. Cognition. 2009. PMID: 19682674
-
The effect of items in working memory on the deployment of attention and the eyes during visual search.J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2006 Apr;32(2):423-42. doi: 10.1037/0096-1523.32.2.423. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2006. PMID: 16634680
-
Invariant visual object recognition: a model, with lighting invariance.J Physiol Paris. 2006 Jul-Sep;100(1-3):43-62. doi: 10.1016/j.jphysparis.2006.09.004. Epub 2006 Oct 30. J Physiol Paris. 2006. PMID: 17071062 Review.
Cited by
-
Interaction between numbers and size during visual search.Psychol Res. 2017 May;81(3):664-677. doi: 10.1007/s00426-016-0771-4. Epub 2016 May 3. Psychol Res. 2017. PMID: 27142070 Free PMC article.
-
Measuring visual search and distraction in immersive virtual reality.R Soc Open Sci. 2018 May 2;5(5):172331. doi: 10.1098/rsos.172331. eCollection 2018 May. R Soc Open Sci. 2018. PMID: 29892418 Free PMC article.
-
A diffusion modeling approach to understanding contextual cueing effects in children with ADHD.J Child Psychol Psychiatry. 2014 Dec;55(12):1336-44. doi: 10.1111/jcpp.12250. Epub 2014 May 3. J Child Psychol Psychiatry. 2014. PMID: 24798140 Free PMC article.
-
Extrafoveal Processing in Categorical Search for Geometric Shapes: General Tendencies and Individual Variations.Cogn Sci. 2021 Aug;45(8):e13025. doi: 10.1111/cogs.13025. Cogn Sci. 2021. PMID: 34379345 Free PMC article.
-
Effects of part-based similarity on visual search: the Frankenbear experiment.Vision Res. 2012 Feb 1;54:20-30. doi: 10.1016/j.visres.2011.12.004. Epub 2012 Jan 2. Vision Res. 2012. PMID: 22227607 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
