Jumping versus nonjumping anterior cruciate ligament injuries: a comparison of pathology

Clin J Sport Med. 2003 Jan;13(1):1-5. doi: 10.1097/00042752-200301000-00001.


Objective: To compare pathology in knees with an anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injury as a result of a jumping mechanism with knees injured from a nonjumping mechanism.

Design: This was a prospective study of 263 consecutive patients with a complete ACL tear and no subsequent giving way episodes nor reinjuries prior to undergoing an ACL reconstruction. The patients were placed into one of two groups: those with knees injured as a result of a jumping injury, and those with knees injured as a result of a nonjumping injury.

Setting: This study was performed at the Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, Ohio.

Patients: Anterior cruciate ligament-deficient knees undergoing ACL reconstruction. Two hundred thirty-eight (91%) of the patients were injured while participating in sports.

Main outcome measured: Intra-articular pathology documented prospectively at the time of arthroscopy.

Results: Knees injured as a result of a jumping mechanism had a higher incidence of medial (p = 0.05) and lateral (p = 0.03) meniscal tears and a lower incidence of medial collateral ligament injuries (p = 0.05). No difference in arthroscopic articular cartilage injuries was seen between the two groups.

Conclusions: We believe that identifying jumping as a mechanism of ACL tears is important, since a jumping mechanism is associated with a significantly increased meniscus tear rate and may predispose this population to future degenerative changes.

Publication types

  • Comparative Study

MeSH terms

  • Adult
  • Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injuries*
  • Athletic Injuries / pathology*
  • Female
  • Humans
  • Knee Injuries / pathology*
  • Male
  • Prospective Studies