The aim of this study was to evaluate the clinical quality of removable dentures of elderly Finnish men, which had been prepared either by dentists, denturists or dental laboratory technicians. The participants comprised 242 denture-wearing subjects, with 231 maxillary and 177 mandibular removable dentures which had been prepared either by dentists, denturists or dental laboratory technicians. Clinical examinations were carried out without the examining dentist knowing who had provided the dentures. Complete dentures which had been illegally provided by laboratory technicians had significantly poorer retention and fitted less well in tuber and alveolar areas than those provided by either dentists or denturists. Complete maxillary dentures which had been provided illegally by laboratory technicians had significantly (P < 0.01) higher occurrence (90%) of some unacceptable characteristics than those (43%) provided by dentists or denturists. The difference between complete mandibular dentures was also obvious, 86% versus 59%, although statistically non-significant. Of those partial maxillary dentures provided by dentists 53% had some unacceptable characteristics, compared with 80% of those illegally provided by denturists or laboratory technicians (NS). In the case of partial mandibular dentures, 36% of those provided by dentists and 32% of those by denturists or laboratory technicians had some unacceptable characteristic (NS). Illegal provision of removable dentures seemed to be related to decreased clinical quality.