[Surgical treatment of anal incontinence]

Ann Chir. 2002 Nov;127(9):670-9. doi: 10.1016/s0003-3944(02)00881-7.
[Article in French]

Abstract

Surgery is mandatory for fecal incontinence when medical treatments and reeducation by biofeedback are ineffective. Sphincter disruption is the most frequent cause. Sphincter repair with or without overlapping is indicated in the large majority of cases. Short-term results are good but result is not ever maintained with time. In case of failure, or when the defect concerns more than 180 degrees, it is necessary to use a substitutive technique. Artificial anal sphincter is often first proposed because of its apparent technical simplicity and because it is cheaper than dynamic graciloplasty. Results are excellent. Failures are due to local infection or device disfunction. Dynamic graciloplastie may be proposed in patients with severe perineal lesions, or failure of the other methods. Its results are also excellent, except for the patients having disordered rectal perception. Sacral nerve stimulation is limited to patients with idiopathic or neurologic incontinence. Because definitive implantation is done only following positive preoperative stimulation test, short-term results are very good.

Publication types

  • English Abstract
  • Review

MeSH terms

  • Adult
  • Age Factors
  • Aged
  • Anal Canal / innervation
  • Anal Canal / surgery*
  • Child
  • Cohort Studies
  • Electric Stimulation Therapy
  • Fecal Incontinence / epidemiology
  • Fecal Incontinence / etiology
  • Fecal Incontinence / surgery*
  • Female
  • Follow-Up Studies
  • Humans
  • Male
  • Middle Aged
  • Multicenter Studies as Topic
  • Muscle, Skeletal / transplantation
  • Postoperative Complications
  • Prostheses and Implants
  • Quality of Life
  • Suture Techniques
  • Time Factors