Marital status and family size of type 1 diabetic patients in a French cohort

Diabetes Metab. 2003 Apr;29(2 Pt 1):171-4. doi: 10.1016/s1262-3636(07)70025-3.

Abstract

Objective: To compare the marital status, the number of offspring and the cumulative incidence of type 1 diabetes in offspring of type 1 diabetic men and women.

Methods: From the database of patients attending our department, we reviewed the files of all the 352 subjects aged >=40 years with type 1 diabetes and compared male and female patients for whom age, age at diagnosis of diabetes, marital status, socio-economic status, number and age of offspring, diagnosed type 1 diabetes in the offspring could be obtained from patient's record and/or direct interview (86 males and 78 females).

Results: In this population, 73% of women and 81% of men were married or living a marital life (NS), and 35% of women versus 8% of men had no offspring (P<0.0001). The proportion of parents with 2 offspring or more was 43% in females and 61% in males (p=0.03) and was not related to the socio-economic status. The number of offspring with diagnosed type 1 diabetes was small (8/229) and did not show significant association with gender of the parent, with a cumulative incidence of 3.2 and 3.7% in offspring of type 1 diabetic mothers and fathers respectively.

Conclusion: Type 1 diabetic women born before 1960 had fewer children than men. In this cohort, there was no difference in the cumulative incidence of type 1 diabetes in offspring of type 1 diabetic men and women despite reduced family size in women.

Publication types

  • Comparative Study
  • Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

MeSH terms

  • Adult
  • Age of Onset
  • Cohort Studies
  • Databases, Factual
  • Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1 / epidemiology*
  • Family Characteristics*
  • Female
  • France / epidemiology
  • Humans
  • Male
  • Marital Status / statistics & numerical data*
  • Marriage
  • Medical Records
  • Middle Aged
  • Nuclear Family
  • Retrospective Studies
  • Sex Characteristics
  • Socioeconomic Factors