The measurement of mechanical properties of biological tissues is subject to artifacts such as natural variability and inconsistency in specimen preparation. As a result, data cannot be easily compared across laboratories. To test the effects of variable specimen dimensions, we systematically modified the size and aspect ratio (AR) of porcine aortic valve tissues and measured their stiffness and extensibility. We found that: (i) as the AR of circumferential specimens increased from 1:1 to 5:1, their stiffness increased by 36% (p < 0.001) and their extensibility decreased by 21% (p < 0.001); (ii) as the AR of radial specimens increased from 0.8:1 to 4:1, their stiffness increased by 36% (p < 0.001) and their extensibility decreased by 34% (p < 0.001); (iii) as the size of circumferential specimens was reduced from 128 to 32 mm2 at fixed AR (2:1), their stiffness decreased by 6 (p = 0.05), and their extensibility increased by 17% (p < 0.001); and (iv) as the size of radial specimens was reduced from 72 to 32 mm2 at fixed AR (2:1), their stiffness decreased by 7% (p = 0.03) and their extensibility increased by 16% (p = 0.005). Thus, as specimens of constant length became narrower, they became stiffer and less extensible, and as specimens of fixed aspect ratio became smaller, they became less stiff and more extensible. Statistical models of these trends were predictive and can thus be used to integrate materials test data across different laboratories.