Skip to main page content
Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2003;(2):CD003494.
doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003494.

The Effectiveness of Psychosocial Interventions Delivered by General Practitioners

Affiliations
Review

The Effectiveness of Psychosocial Interventions Delivered by General Practitioners

M J H Huibers et al. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. .

Update in

  • Psychosocial interventions by general practitioners.
    Huibers MJ, Beurskens AJ, Bleijenberg G, van Schayck CP. Huibers MJ, et al. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2007 Jul 18;2007(3):CD003494. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003494.pub2. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2007. PMID: 17636726 Free PMC article. Review.

Abstract

Background: Many patients visit their general practitioner (GP) because of problems that are psychosocial in origin. However, for many of these problems there is no evidence-based treatment available in primary care, and these patients place time-consuming demands on their GP. Therefore, GPs could benefit from tools to help these patients more effectively and efficiently. In this light, it is important to assess whether structured psychosocial interventions might be an appropriate tool for GPs. Previous reviews have shown that psychosocial interventions in primary care seem more effective that usual care. However, these interventions were mostly performed by health professionals other than the GP.

Objectives: To present a systematic review of the literature addressing the effectiveness of psychosocial interventions by general practitioners by assessing the clinical outcomes and the methodological quality of selected studies.

Search strategy: The literature search was conducted using the CCDAN Trials Register, the Cochrane Library and reference lists of relevant studies for citation tracking. Also, personal communication with experts took place.

Selection criteria: Randomised controlled trials, controlled clinical trials and controlled patient preference trials addressing the effectiveness of psychosocial interventions by GPs for any problem or disorder. Studies published before January 2002 were eligible for entry.

Data collection and analysis: Methodological quality was independently be assessed by two reviewers using the Maastricht-Amsterdam Criteria List and the CCDAN Quality Rating Scale. The qualitative and quantitative characteristics of selected trials were independently extracted by two reviewers using a standardised data extraction form. Levels of evidence were used to determine the strength of the evidence available. Results from studies that reported similar interventions and outcome measures were meta-analysed.

Main results: Eight studies were included in the review. Selected studies addressed different psychosocial interventions for four distinct disorders or health complaints. There is good evidence that problem-solving treatment by general practitioners is effective for major depression. The evidence concerning the remaining interventions for other health complaints (reattribution or cognitive behavioural group therapy for somatisation, counselling for smoking cessation, behavioural interventions to reduce alcohol reduction) is either limited or conflicting.

Reviewer's conclusions: In general, there is little available evidence on the use of psychosocial interventions by general practitioners. Of the psychosocial interventions reviewed, problem-solving treatment for depression seems the most promising tool for GPs, although a stronger evidence-base is required and the effectiveness in routine practice remains to be demonstrated. More research is required to improve the evidence-base on this subject.

Similar articles

See all similar articles

Cited by 16 articles

See all "Cited by" articles

LinkOut - more resources

Feedback