Gyrus bipolar electrovaporization vs transurethral resection of the prostate: a randomized prospective single-blind trial with 1 y follow-up

Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis. 2003;6(2):182-6. doi: 10.1038/sj.pcan.4500631.

Abstract

The Gyrus system uses bipolar electrocautery with saline irrigation to vaporize prostatic tissue and is compared to transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP) in a randomized prospective study with 1 y follow-up. Outcomes measured were fluid absorption, blood loss, period of catheterization, hospital stay, symptom scores, quality of life, flow rates, and post-void residual volumes at 3, 6, and 12 months. All measured parameters were similar, although re-catheterization rates were higher (30% vs 5%) in the Gyrus group. Clot evacuation rates were higher in the TURP group (19% vs 0%). The Gyrus device is safe and produces results that are similar to TURP at 1 y.

Publication types

  • Clinical Trial
  • Comparative Study
  • Randomized Controlled Trial

MeSH terms

  • Aged
  • Equipment Design
  • Humans
  • Length of Stay
  • Male
  • Middle Aged
  • Postoperative Complications*
  • Prostatic Neoplasms / surgery*
  • Quality of Life
  • Single-Blind Method
  • Sodium Chloride / administration & dosage
  • Therapeutic Irrigation
  • Transurethral Resection of Prostate / methods*
  • Treatment Outcome
  • Urinary Catheterization
  • Water-Electrolyte Balance

Substances

  • Sodium Chloride