Robust myelin water quantification: averaging vs. spatial filtering

Magn Reson Med. 2003 Jul;50(1):206-9. doi: 10.1002/mrm.10492.

Abstract

The myelin water fraction is calculated, voxel-by-voxel, by fitting decay curves from a multi-echo data acquisition. Curve-fitting algorithms require a high signal-to-noise ratio to separate T(2) components in the T(2) distribution. This work compared the effect of averaging, during acquisition, to data postprocessed with a noise reduction filter. Forty regions, from five volunteers, were analyzed. A consistent decrease in the myelin water fraction variability with no bias in the mean was found for all 40 regions. Images of the myelin water fraction of white matter were more contiguous and had fewer "holes" than images of myelin water fractions from unfiltered echoes. Spatial filtering was effective for decreasing the variability in myelin water fraction calculated from 4-average multi-echo data.

Publication types

  • Comparative Study
  • Evaluation Study
  • Validation Study

MeSH terms

  • Algorithms*
  • Anisotropy
  • Brain / metabolism*
  • Brain Chemistry
  • Corpus Callosum / chemistry
  • Corpus Callosum / metabolism
  • Diffusion Magnetic Resonance Imaging / methods*
  • Humans
  • Image Enhancement / methods*
  • Myelin Sheath / chemistry
  • Myelin Sheath / metabolism*
  • Signal Processing, Computer-Assisted*
  • Water / analysis*
  • Water / metabolism

Substances

  • Water