Patients' perspectives on electroconvulsive therapy: systematic review

BMJ. 2003 Jun 21;326(7403):1363. doi: 10.1136/bmj.326.7403.1363.

Abstract

Objective: To ascertain patients' views on the benefits of and possible memory loss from electroconvulsive therapy.

Design: Descriptive systematic review.

Data sources: Psychinfo, Medline, Web of Science, and Social Science Citation Index databases, and bibliographies.

Study selection: Articles with patients' views after treatment with electroconvulsive therapy.

Data extraction: 26 studies carried out by clinicians and nine reports of work undertaken by patients or with the collaboration of patients were identified; 16 studies investigated the perceived benefit of electroconvulsive therapy and seven met criteria for investigating memory loss.

Data synthesis: The studies showed heterogeneity. The methods used were associated with levels of perceived benefit. At least one third of patients reported persistent memory loss.

Conclusions: The current statement for patients from the Royal College of Psychiatrists that over 80% of patients are satisfied with electroconvulsive therapy and that memory loss is not clinically important is unfounded.

Publication types

  • Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
  • Review
  • Systematic Review

MeSH terms

  • Attitude to Health*
  • Electroconvulsive Therapy / adverse effects
  • Electroconvulsive Therapy / psychology*
  • Humans
  • Memory Disorders / etiology*
  • Patient Satisfaction