Ultrasonic locating devices for central venous cannulation: meta-analysis
- PMID: 12919984
- PMCID: PMC175809
- DOI: 10.1136/bmj.327.7411.361
Ultrasonic locating devices for central venous cannulation: meta-analysis
Abstract
Objectives: To assess the evidence for the clinical effectiveness of ultrasound guided central venous cannulation.
Data sources: 15 electronic bibliographic databases, covering biomedical, science, social science, health economics, and grey literature.
Design: Systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials. Populations Patients scheduled for central venous access. INTERVENTION REVIEWED: Guidance using real time two dimensional ultrasonography or Doppler needles and probes compared with the anatomical landmark method of cannulation.
Data extraction: Risk of failed catheter placement (primary outcome), risk of complications from placement, risk of failure on first attempt at placement, number of attempts to successful catheterisation, and time (seconds) to successful catheterisation.
Data synthesis: 18 trials (1646 participants) were identified. Compared with the landmark method, real time two dimensional ultrasound guidance for cannulating the internal jugular vein in adults was associated with a significantly lower failure rate both overall (relative risk 0.14, 95% confidence interval 0.06 to 0.33) and on the first attempt (0.59, 0.39 to 0.88). Limited evidence favoured two dimensional ultrasound guidance for subclavian vein and femoral vein procedures in adults (0.14, 0.04 to 0.57 and 0.29, 0.07 to 1.21, respectively). Three studies in infants confirmed a higher success rate with two dimensional ultrasonography for internal jugular procedures (0.15, 0.03 to 0.64). Doppler guided cannulation of the internal jugular vein in adults was more successful than the landmark method (0.39, 0.17 to 0.92), but the landmark method was more successful for subclavian vein procedures (1.48, 1.03 to 2.14). No significant difference was found between these techniques for cannulation of the internal jugular vein in infants. An indirect comparison of relative risks suggested that two dimensional ultrasonography would be more successful than Doppler guidance for subclavian vein procedures in adults (0.09, 0.02 to 0.38).
Conclusions: Evidence supports the use of two dimensional ultrasonography for central venous cannulation.
Figures
Similar articles
-
Ultrasound guidance versus anatomical landmarks for internal jugular vein catheterization.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015 Jan 9;1(1):CD006962. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD006962.pub2. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015. PMID: 25575244 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Ultrasound guidance versus anatomical landmarks for subclavian or femoral vein catheterization.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015 Jan 9;1(1):CD011447. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011447. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015. PMID: 25575245 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Venous cutdown versus the Seldinger technique for placement of totally implantable venous access ports.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016 Aug 21;2016(8):CD008942. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD008942.pub2. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016. PMID: 27544827 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Real-time ultrasound-guided catheterisation of the internal jugular vein: a prospective comparison with the landmark technique in critical care patients.Crit Care. 2006;10(6):R162. doi: 10.1186/cc5101. Crit Care. 2006. PMID: 17112371 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
Is long-axis view superior to short-axis view in ultrasound-guided central venous catheterization?Crit Care Med. 2015 Apr;43(4):832-9. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000000823. Crit Care Med. 2015. PMID: 25517477 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
Cited by
-
Evaluating the precision of ultrasound versus computed tomography-guided measurement of cricoid cartilage diameter for double-lumen tube selection in thoracic surgery: A randomised comparative study.Indian J Anaesth. 2024 Oct;68(10):896-901. doi: 10.4103/ija.ija_641_24. Epub 2024 Sep 14. Indian J Anaesth. 2024. PMID: 39449846 Free PMC article.
-
Stepping into the Virtual Realm: Examining the Utility of Non-Immersive VR on Medical Residents' Self-Efficacy, Performance, and Satisfaction.Hum Factors Health. 2024 Jun;5:100072. doi: 10.1016/j.hfh.2024.100072. Epub 2024 Mar 29. Hum Factors Health. 2024. PMID: 39431120
-
Cubital vein access provides a practical alternative to internal jugular vein access for coronary sinus catheter placement.J Arrhythm. 2024 Jul 7;40(4):991-997. doi: 10.1002/joa3.13110. eCollection 2024 Aug. J Arrhythm. 2024. PMID: 39139888 Free PMC article.
-
Ultrasound-Guided Versus Palpation-Guided Techniques to Achieve Vascular Access in Children Undergoing Cardiac Surgery: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.Pediatr Cardiol. 2024 Jul 27. doi: 10.1007/s00246-024-03581-y. Online ahead of print. Pediatr Cardiol. 2024. PMID: 39068328 Review.
-
Short-axis versus long-axis approach for ultrasound-guided vascular access: An updated systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials.Indian J Anaesth. 2023 Nov;67(Suppl 4):S208-S217. doi: 10.4103/ija.ija_965_22. Epub 2023 Nov 21. Indian J Anaesth. 2023. PMID: 38187975 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Elliot TSJ, Faroqui MH, Armstrong RF, Hanson GC. Guidelines for good practice in central venous catheterization. J Hosp Infect 1994;28: 163-76. - PubMed
-
- Callum KG, Whimster F. Interventional vascular radiology and interventional neurovascular radiology: a report of the National Confidential Enquiry into Perioperative Deaths. Data collection period 1 Apr 1998 to 31 Mar 1999. London, NCEPOD, 2000.
-
- Trottier SJ, Veremakis C, O'Brien J, Auer AI. Femoral deep vein thrombosis associated with central venous catheterization: results from a prospective, randomized trial. Crit Care Med 1995;23: 52-9. - PubMed
-
- Calvert N, Hind D, McWilliams RG, Thomas SM, Beverley C, Davidson A. The effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of ultrasound locating devices for central venous access: a systematic review. Health Technol Assess 2003:7(12). - PubMed
-
- Schulz KF, Chalmers I, Hayes RJ, Altman DG. Empirical evidence of bias: dimensions of methodological quality associated with estimates of treatment effects in controlled trials. JAMA 2003;273: 408-12. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources