Abstract
Given the limitations of low enrollments, this study suggests that a change of 130% for B-type natiuretic peptide (BNP) and 90% for N-terminal (NT)-proBNP are necessary before results of serially collected data can be considered statistically different. This study also shows that there are important differences in the performance of BNP versus NT-proBNP in monitoring patients with congestive heart failure that need to be further explored.
MeSH terms
-
Adult
-
Analysis of Variance
-
Atrial Natriuretic Factor / blood*
-
Biomarkers / blood
-
Case-Control Studies
-
Discriminant Analysis
-
Drug Monitoring / methods*
-
Drug Monitoring / standards
-
Female
-
Heart Failure / blood*
-
Heart Failure / classification
-
Heart Failure / diagnosis
-
Heart Failure / drug therapy
-
Humans
-
Immunoassay / methods
-
Immunoassay / standards
-
Male
-
Middle Aged
-
Natriuretic Peptide, Brain
-
Observer Variation
-
Pilot Projects
-
Point-of-Care Systems / standards
-
Protein Precursors / blood*
-
Radioimmunoassay / methods
-
Radioimmunoassay / standards
-
Reference Values
-
Sensitivity and Specificity
-
Severity of Illness Index
-
Time Factors
Substances
-
Biomarkers
-
N-terminal proatrial natriuretic peptide
-
Protein Precursors
-
Natriuretic Peptide, Brain
-
Atrial Natriuretic Factor