Skip to main page content
Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
, 10 (5), 780-6

Validation of Serological Correlate of Protection for Meningococcal C Conjugate Vaccine by Using Efficacy Estimates From Postlicensure Surveillance in England

Affiliations
Comparative Study

Validation of Serological Correlate of Protection for Meningococcal C Conjugate Vaccine by Using Efficacy Estimates From Postlicensure Surveillance in England

Nick Andrews et al. Clin Diagn Lab Immunol.

Abstract

Meningococcal C conjugate (MCC) vaccines were licensed on the basis of serological correlates of protection without efficacy data. The original correlate of protection was established by using a serum bactericidal antibody assay (SBA) with human complement (hSBA), with titers > or =4 predicting protection. However, the antibody data supporting licensure were largely generated by SBA with rabbit complement (rSBA), which gives higher titers than hSBA. While rSBA titers > or =128 reliably predict protection, as measured by hSBA, sera with rSBA titers in the range of 8 to 64 may not have hSBA titers > or =4. For rSBA titers in this equivocal range, a fourfold rise pre- to postvaccination with the MCC vaccine and/or a characteristic booster response to a polysaccharide challenge was proposed as a correlate of protection. To validate this proposed rSBA correlate, age-specific efficacy estimates for MCC vaccines obtained from postlicensure surveillance in England were compared with the efficacy predicted by the percentage of individuals in these age groups with rSBA titers above different cutoffs at 4 weeks and at 7 to 9 months after vaccination with the MCC vaccine. The average time since vaccination in the cohorts in whom efficacy was measured ranged from 8 to 10 months. The rSBA cutoff of > or =128 was shown to significantly underestimate efficacy, with rSBA cutoffs of > or =4 or > or =8 at 4 weeks postvaccination with the MCC vaccine being the most consistent with observed efficacy. When the levels obtained 7 to 9 months postvaccination with the MCC vaccine were used, all rSBA cutoffs significantly underestimated efficacy, suggesting that continuing protection is less dependent on the SBA level at the time of exposure but is more reliant on immunologic memory.

Figures

FIG. 1.
FIG. 1.
Efficacy predicted on the basis of the proportions of unvaccinated and vaccinated individuals with titers below the different rSBA cutoffs measured 1 month following vaccination with the MCC vaccine.
FIG. 1.
FIG. 1.
Efficacy predicted on the basis of the proportions of unvaccinated and vaccinated individuals with titers below the different rSBA cutoffs measured 1 month following vaccination with the MCC vaccine.
FIG. 2.
FIG. 2.
Efficacy predicted on the basis of the proportions of unvaccinated and vaccinated individuals with titers below the different rSBA cutoffs measured 9 months (infants) or 7 months (toddlers) months following vaccination with the MCC vaccine.

Similar articles

See all similar articles

Cited by 100 PubMed Central articles

See all "Cited by" articles

Substances

LinkOut - more resources

Feedback