Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2003 Sep 15;162(6):1079-88.
doi: 10.1083/jcb.200303023.

Molecular requirements for actin-based lamella formation in Drosophila S2 cells

Affiliations

Molecular requirements for actin-based lamella formation in Drosophila S2 cells

Stephen L Rogers et al. J Cell Biol. .

Abstract

Cell migration occurs through the protrusion of the actin-enriched lamella. Here, we investigated the effects of RNAi depletion of approximately 90 proteins implicated in actin function on lamella formation in Drosophila S2 cells. Similar to in vitro reconstitution studies of actin-based Listeria movement, we find that lamellae formation requires a relatively small set of proteins that participate in actin nucleation (Arp2/3 and SCAR), barbed end capping (capping protein), filament depolymerization (cofilin and Aip1), and actin monomer binding (profilin and cyclase-associated protein). Lamellae are initiated by parallel and partially redundant signaling pathways involving Rac GTPases and the adaptor protein Nck, which stimulate SCAR, an Arp2/3 activator. We also show that RNAi of three proteins (kette, Abi, and Sra-1) known to copurify with and inhibit SCAR in vitro leads to SCAR degradation, revealing a novel function of this protein complex in SCAR stability. Our results have identified an essential set of proteins involved in actin dynamics during lamella formation in Drosophila S2 cells.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Drosophila S2 cells attach, spread, and form lamellae when plated on con A. S2 cells expressing EGFP–actin were plated on polylysine (a and b) or con A (c and d) and examined by phase contrast (a and c) or fluorescence microscopy (b and d). Cells on polylysine retain a spherical morphology but form actin-containing membrane ruffles along their surface. When plated on con A, the majority of S2 cells (>90%) spread to form a radially symmetrical actin-based lamellae (c and d). Bar, 5 μm. (e) A single frame from a time-lapse movie of an S2 cell expressing GFP–actin and plated on con A. The yellow line represents the region of the movie used to generate the kymograph shown in f. Bar, 1 μm. (f) This kymograph shows the behavior of actin over time in a lamella. The shark fin shape is indicative of cycles of extension and retraction at the cell margin, while the diagonal lines visualize the retrograde flow of actin at the cell periphery. Bar, 30 s.
Figure 2.
Figure 2.
Immunofluorescence localization of actin regulatory proteins to lamellae of S2 cells. S2 cells were plated on con A for 1 h and then fixed and double stained for actin (red) and Arp3 (a, green), SCAR (b, green), cofilin/twinstar (c, green), profilin (d, green), enabled (e, green), or capping protein (f, green). Bar, 5 μm.
Figure 3.
Figure 3.
RNAi-mediated inhibition of actin regulatory proteins disrupts normal cellular morphology in S2 cells on con A. Untreated cells are shown in Fig. 1 (c and d). Cells were treated with dsRNA against the p20 subunit of the Arp2/3 complex (a), profilin/chickadee (b), cofilin/twinstar (c), slingshot (d), capping protein β (e), Cdc42 (f), Rho1 (g), and myosin II/zipper (h) for 7 d and then plated on con A and stained with rhodamine-phalloidin (red) and DAPI (blue) to visualize filamentous actin and DNA, respectively. (i) Immunoblots demonstrating the effectiveness of RNAi on the levels of 13 different proteins: cofilin/twinstar, capping protein β (CPB), SCAR, Rho1, diaphanous (Dia), enabled (Ena), myosin VI (MVI), Nck/dreadlocks (Dock), Pod1, fascin/singed, lethal giant larvae (LGL), and Trio. Exactly 10 μg of total cellular protein was loaded for each lane. Bars, 5 μm.
Figure 4.
Figure 4.
Control of SCAR degradation and activation. Inhibition of SCAR-associated proteins kette, Sra-1, or Abi by RNAi causes degradation of SCAR itself. S2 cells were treated with dsRNA corresponding to the coding sequence for Sra-1 (a) for 7 d and then plated on con A and stained with phalloidin to visualize actin (red) and DAPI to view DNA (blue). The morphology of these cells closely resembles the defects in lamellae formation produced by Arp2/3 and SCAR RNAi (Fig. 3, b and c). Similar results were observed with RNAi against kette and Abi (not depicted). Bar, 5 μm. (b) Quantitative immunoblotting of cells treated with dsRNA versus Abi, kette, SCAR, and Sra-1 with antibodies against SCAR. Depletion of these proteins by RNAi decreases the amount of SCAR present in S2 cells. Equal protein loading was verified by Bradford assay (not depicted). (c and d) Cells treated with dsRNAi to simultaneously inhibit Rac1, Rac2, Mtl, and Nck show a variety of lamella defects. Among these are a malformed, serrate cell margin (c) and the stellate morphology similar to SCAR RNAi (Fig. 3, b and c). (e) Graph showing the quantitation of morphological defects caused by inhibition of Nck, Rac1/2, and Mtl. Bars, 5 μm.
Figure 5.
Figure 5.
Model for the signaling pathway leading to SCAR activation during S2 cell lamella formation. The con A–coated coverslip activates both Rac proteins and Nck by initially cross-linking an unidentified cell surface receptor(s). The Rac proteins and Nck signal through parallel pathways to cause dissociation of trans-inhibited SCAR bound by a complex of kette, Sra-1, and Abi. After dissociation, SCAR is able to promote actin nucleation by Arp2/3 at the cell membrane. SCAR may then be inactivated either by reassociation with its inhibitory complex or by degradation.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Ayscough, K.R., and D.G. Drubin. 1996. ACTIN: general principles from studies in yeast. Annu. Rev. Cell Dev. Biol. 12:129–160. - PubMed
    1. Bashaw, G.J., T. Kidd, D. Murray, T. Pawson, and C.S. Goodman. 2000. Repulsive axon guidance: Abelson and Enabled play opposing roles downstream of the Roundabout receptor. Cell. 101:703–715. - PubMed
    1. Baum, B., W. Li, and N. Perrimon. 2000. A cyclase-associated protein regulates actin and cell polarity during Drosophila oogenesis and in yeast. Curr. Biol. 10:964–973. - PubMed
    1. Bear, J.E., T.M. Svitkina, M. Krause, D.A. Schafer, J.J. Loureiro, G.A. Strasser, I.V. Maly, O.Y. Chaga, J.A. Cooper, G.G. Borisy, and F.B. Gertler. 2002. Antagonism between Ena/VASP proteins and actin filament capping regulates fibroblast motility. Cell. 109:509–521. - PubMed
    1. Ben-Yaacov, S., R. Le Borgne, I. Abramson, F. Schweisguth, and E.D. Schejter. 2001. Wasp, the Drosophila Wiskott-Aldrich syndrome gene homologue, is required for cell fate decisions mediated by Notch signaling. J. Cell Biol. 152:1–13. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms

Substances