Auditory segregation of competing voices: absence of effects of FM or AM coherence
- PMID: 1354375
- DOI: 10.1098/rstb.1992.0069
Auditory segregation of competing voices: absence of effects of FM or AM coherence
Abstract
Four experiments sought evidence that listeners can use coherent changes in the frequency or amplitude of harmonics to segregate concurrent vowels. Segregation was not helped by giving the harmonics of competing vowels different patterns of frequency or amplitude modulation. However, modulating the frequencies of the components of one vowel was beneficial when the other vowel was not modulated, provided that both vowels were composed of components placed randomly in frequency. In addition, staggering the onsets of the two vowels, so that the amplitude of one vowel increased abruptly while the amplitude of the other was stationary, was also beneficial. Thus, the results demonstrate that listeners can group changing harmonics and can segregate them from stationary harmonics, but cannot use coherence of change to separate two sets of changing harmonics.
Similar articles
-
The psychophysics of concurrent sound segregation.Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 1992 Jun 29;336(1278):347-55. doi: 10.1098/rstb.1992.0068. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 1992. PMID: 1354374
-
Modulation discrimination interference and auditory grouping.Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 1992 Jun 29;336(1278):339-46. doi: 10.1098/rstb.1992.0067. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 1992. PMID: 1354373
-
Effects of differences in the pattern of amplitude envelopes across harmonics on auditory stream segregation.Hear Res. 2004 Jul;193(1-2):95-104. doi: 10.1016/j.heares.2004.03.009. Hear Res. 2004. PMID: 15219324
-
Breaking the wave: effects of attention and learning on concurrent sound perception.Hear Res. 2007 Jul;229(1-2):225-36. doi: 10.1016/j.heares.2007.01.011. Epub 2007 Jan 16. Hear Res. 2007. PMID: 17303355 Review.
-
The role of formant amplitude in the perception of /i/ and /u/.J Acoust Soc Am. 2010 Apr;127(4):2611-21. doi: 10.1121/1.3353124. J Acoust Soc Am. 2010. PMID: 20370042
Cited by
-
Binaural-bimodal fitting or bilateral implantation for managing severe to profound deafness: a review.Trends Amplif. 2007 Sep;11(3):161-92. doi: 10.1177/1084713807304357. Trends Amplif. 2007. PMID: 17709573 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Fundamental frequency is critical to speech perception in noise in combined acoustic and electric hearing.J Acoust Soc Am. 2011 Oct;130(4):2054-62. doi: 10.1121/1.3631563. J Acoust Soc Am. 2011. PMID: 21973360 Free PMC article.
-
Effect of fundamental-frequency and sentence-onset differences on speech-identification performance of young and older adults in a competing-talker background.J Acoust Soc Am. 2012 Sep;132(3):1700-17. doi: 10.1121/1.4740482. J Acoust Soc Am. 2012. PMID: 22978898 Free PMC article.
-
Overtone focusing in biphonic tuvan throat singing.Elife. 2020 Feb 17;9:e50476. doi: 10.7554/eLife.50476. Elife. 2020. PMID: 32048990 Free PMC article.
-
Harmonic Cancellation-A Fundamental of Auditory Scene Analysis.Trends Hear. 2021 Jan-Dec;25:23312165211041422. doi: 10.1177/23312165211041422. Trends Hear. 2021. PMID: 34698574 Free PMC article.
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
