To assess the agreement between magnetic resonance angiography and conventional angiography in the evaluation of carotid stenosis, 61 carotid arteries of 40 patients were studied by combined two- and three-dimensional magnetic resonance angiography and conventional angiography. Stenosis of the internal carotid artery was categorized as mild, moderate, severe, critical, or complete occlusion. In 42 arteries, the degree of stenosis according to magnetic resonance angiography correlated exactly to that found by conventional angiography. In the remaining 19 carotid arteries, the magnetic resonance angiographic measurement of stenosis differed from the conventional angiographic measurement by only one size category. The Spearman rank correlation coefficient was 0.95 (p < 0.001). This study showed that by combining information from two- and three-dimensional magnetic resonance angiographic studies and making use of the advantages of each method, magnetic resonance angiography was comparable to conventional angiography in determining carotid stenosis. Magnetic resonance angiography tended to demonstrate a higher level of stenosis when there was a discrepancy. These data demonstrate that magnetic resonance angiography is a steadily improving technology. Although additional studies need to be done, it seems clear that magnetic resonance angiography will be an imaging modality comparable in accuracy to conventional angiography.