Endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration cytology of solid liver lesions: a large single-center experience

Am J Gastroenterol. 2003 Sep;98(9):1976-81. doi: 10.1111/j.1572-0241.2003.07638.x.

Abstract

Objectives: The aim of this study was to report the sensitivity, cytological diagnoses, endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) features, complications, clinical impact, and long term follow-up of a large single-center experience with endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration (EUS-FNA) of benign and malignant solid liver lesions.

Methods: A database of cytologic specimens from EUS-FNA was reviewed to identify all hepatic lesions aspirated between January, 1997, and July, 2002. Procedural indications, prior radiographic data, patient demographics, EUS examination results, complications, and follow-up data were obtained and recorded.

Results: EUS-FNA of 77 liver lesions in 77 patients was performed without complications. Of these 77 lesions, 45 (58%) were diagnostic for malignancy, 25 (33%) were benign, and seven (9%) were nondiagnostic. A total of 22 lesions were confirmed as negative for malignancy by follow-up (mean 762 days, range 512-1556 days) or intraoperative examination; however, seven lesions could not be classified as benign or malignant. Depending on the status of the seven unclassified lesions, sensitivity of EUS-FNA for the diagnosis of malignancy ranged from 82 to 94%. When compared with benign lesions, EUS features predictive of malignant hepatic masses were the presence of regular outer margins (60% vs 27%; p = 0.02) and the detection of two or more lesions (38% vs 9%; p = 0.03). Of the 42 patients with malignancy identified by EUS-FNA and other available imaging records, EUS detected the malignancy in 41% of patients with previously negative examinations. For the 45 subjects with cytology positive for malignancy, EUS-FNA changed management in 86% of subjects.

Conclusion: EUS-FNA of the liver is a safe and sensitive procedure that can have a significant impact on patient management. Prospective studies comparing the accuracy and complication rate of EUS-FNA and percutaneous fine needle aspiration (P-FNA) for the diagnosis of liver tumors are needed.

Publication types

  • Comparative Study

MeSH terms

  • Aged
  • Biopsy, Needle
  • Cohort Studies
  • Confidence Intervals
  • Cytodiagnosis / methods
  • Diagnosis, Differential
  • Endosonography* / methods*
  • Female
  • Humans
  • Immunohistochemistry
  • Liver Diseases / diagnostic imaging*
  • Liver Diseases / pathology*
  • Liver Neoplasms / diagnostic imaging
  • Liver Neoplasms / pathology
  • Male
  • Middle Aged
  • Probability
  • Retrospective Studies
  • Sensitivity and Specificity