Laparoscopic (vs open) live donor nephrectomy: a UNOS database analysis of early graft function and survival

Am J Transplant. 2003 Oct;3(10):1295-301. doi: 10.1046/j.1600-6143.2003.00216.x.


The impact of laparoscopic (lap) live donor nephrectomy on early graft function and survival remains controversial. We compared 2734 kidney transplants (tx) from lap donors and 2576 tx from open donors reported to the U.S. United Network for Organ Sharing from 11/1999 to 12/2000. Early function quality (>40 mL urine and/or serum creatinine [creat] decline >25% during the first 24 h post-tx) and delayed function incidence were similar for both groups. Significantly more lap (vs. open) txs, however, had discharge creats greater than 1.4 mg/dL (49.2% vs. 44.9%, p = 0.002) and 2.0 mg/dL (21.8% vs. 19.5%, p = 0.04). But all later creats, early and late rejection, as well as graft survival at 1 year (94.4%, lap tx vs. 94.1%, open tx) were similar for lap and open recipients. Our data suggests that lap nephrectomy is associated with slower early graft function. Rejection rates and short-term graft survival, however, were similar for lap and open graft recipients. Further prospective studies with longer follow up are necessary to assess the potential impact of the laparoscopic procurement mode on early graft function and long-term outcome.

MeSH terms

  • Adult
  • Databases as Topic
  • Female
  • Graft Survival*
  • Humans
  • Kidney Transplantation / methods
  • Kidney Transplantation / statistics & numerical data
  • Laparoscopy / methods
  • Laparoscopy / statistics & numerical data
  • Living Donors
  • Male
  • Middle Aged
  • Nephrectomy / methods*
  • Nephrectomy / statistics & numerical data
  • Retrospective Studies
  • Time Factors
  • Tissue and Organ Procurement / methods
  • Tissue and Organ Procurement / statistics & numerical data
  • Treatment Outcome
  • United States