Sirolimus-eluting stents for treatment of patients with long atherosclerotic lesions in small coronary arteries: double-blind, randomised controlled trial (E-SIRIUS)
- PMID: 14550694
- DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(03)14462-5
Sirolimus-eluting stents for treatment of patients with long atherosclerotic lesions in small coronary arteries: double-blind, randomised controlled trial (E-SIRIUS)
Abstract
Background: Sirolimus-eluting stents have been developed to prevent restenosis in the treatment of coronary artery disease. We investigated the risk of restenosis with use of sirolimus-eluting stents compared with bare-metal stents to assess possible differences.
Methods: We enrolled 352 patients in whom one coronary artery required treatment, with diameter 2.5-3.0 mm and lesion length 15-32 mm. We randomly assigned patients sirolimus-eluting stents (n=175) or bare-metal stents (control, n=177). At 8 months we assessed differences in minimum lumen diameter and binary restenosis within the lesion (restenosis of > or =50% diameter, including 5 mm vessel segments proximal and distal to stented segment). Patients were also followed up for 9 months for major adverse cardiac events. Analysis was by intention to treat.
Findings: Stent implantation was successful in 100% of sirolimus-stent patients and 99.4% of controls. The mean diameter of treated coronary arteries was 2.55 mm (SD 0.37) and mean lesion length was 15.0 mm (6.0). Multiple stents were implanted in 170 (48%) patients. At 8 months, minimum lumen diameter was significantly higher with sirolimus-eluting stents than with control stents (2.22 vs 1.33 mm, p<0.0001). The rate of binary restenosis was significantly reduced with sirolimus-eluting stents compared with control stents (5.9 vs 42.3%, p=0.0001). Significantly fewer patients with sirolimus-eluting stents had major adverse cardiac events at 9 months than did controls (8.0 vs 22.6%, p=0.0002), due mainly to a lower need for target-lesion revascularisations (4.0 vs 20.9%, p<0.0001).
Interpretation: Sirolimus-eluting stents are better than bare-metal stents for treatment of single long atherosclerotic lesions in a coronary vessel smaller than 3 mm in diameter.
Comment in
-
Drug-delivering coronary artery stents: bare metal threatened by extinction?Lancet. 2003 Oct 4;362(9390):1088. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(03)14496-0. Lancet. 2003. PMID: 14550689 No abstract available.
-
What's major about adverse cardiac events?Lancet. 2003 Nov 29;362(9398):1860. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(03)14921-5. Lancet. 2003. PMID: 14654342 No abstract available.
Similar articles
-
Sirolimus-eluting vs uncoated stents for prevention of restenosis in small coronary arteries: a randomized trial.JAMA. 2004 Dec 8;292(22):2727-34. doi: 10.1001/jama.292.22.2727. JAMA. 2004. PMID: 15585732 Clinical Trial.
-
Sirolimus- vs paclitaxel-eluting stents in de novo coronary artery lesions: the REALITY trial: a randomized controlled trial.JAMA. 2006 Feb 22;295(8):895-904. doi: 10.1001/jama.295.8.895. JAMA. 2006. PMID: 16493102 Clinical Trial.
-
Comparison of a polymer-based paclitaxel-eluting stent with a bare metal stent in patients with complex coronary artery disease: a randomized controlled trial.JAMA. 2005 Sep 14;294(10):1215-23. doi: 10.1001/jama.294.10.1215. JAMA. 2005. PMID: 16160130 Clinical Trial.
-
Sirolimus eluting stent in the treatment of atherosclerosis coronary artery disease.Minerva Cardioangiol. 2002 Oct;50(5):405-18. Minerva Cardioangiol. 2002. PMID: 12384623 Review.
-
Recent progress in percutaneous coronary intervention: evolution of the drug-eluting stents, focus on the XIENCE V drug-eluting stent.Coron Artery Dis. 2010 Jan;21(1):46-56. doi: 10.1097/MCA.0b013e328333f550. Coron Artery Dis. 2010. PMID: 19952925 Review.
Cited by
-
Current Challenges in Coronary Bifurcation Interventions.Medicina (Kaunas). 2024 Sep 3;60(9):1439. doi: 10.3390/medicina60091439. Medicina (Kaunas). 2024. PMID: 39336480 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Regulation of vascular remodeling by immune microenvironment after the establishment of autologous arteriovenous fistula in ESRD patients.Front Immunol. 2024 May 14;15:1365422. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2024.1365422. eCollection 2024. Front Immunol. 2024. PMID: 38807593 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Comparative treatment outcomes of a single long stent vs. overlapped short stents in acute myocardial infarction.Front Cardiovasc Med. 2023 Dec 19;10:1284396. doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2023.1284396. eCollection 2023. Front Cardiovasc Med. 2023. PMID: 38179505 Free PMC article.
-
Drug-Eluting Stent Restenosis: Modern Approach to a Classic Challenge.Curr Cardiol Rev. 2023;19(3):e030123212355. doi: 10.2174/1573403X19666230103154638. Curr Cardiol Rev. 2023. PMID: 36597603 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Clinical outcomes of percutaneous coronary intervention for de novo lesions in small coronary arteries: A systematic review and network meta-analysis.Front Cardiovasc Med. 2022 Nov 14;9:1017833. doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2022.1017833. eCollection 2022. Front Cardiovasc Med. 2022. PMID: 36451921 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
