Chemotherapy versus best supportive care for extensive small cell lung cancer
- PMID: 14583943
- DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD001990
Chemotherapy versus best supportive care for extensive small cell lung cancer
Update in
-
Chemotherapy versus best supportive care for extensive small cell lung cancer.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2009 Oct 7;(4):CD001990. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001990.pub2. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2009. Update in: Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013 Nov 27;(11):CD001990. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001990.pub3 PMID: 19821287 Updated. Review.
Abstract
Background: Combination chemotherapy has been the mainstay of treatment for extensive stage small cell lung cancer (SCLC) over the last 25 years even though it only gives a short prolongation in median survival time. The main goal for these patients, if their survival prognosis is limited, should be adequate palliation with the aim of improving their quality of life.
Objectives: To evaluate the effectiveness of chemotherapy in extensive SCLC compared with best supportive care (BSC) or placebo treatment.
Search strategy: Medline (1966-Jan 2003), Embase (1974-Jan 2003), Cancerlit (1993-Jan 2003) and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL, Issue 4, 2002) were searched. In addition experts in the field were contacted to identify further studies not found by electronic searches.
Selection criteria: Randomised controlled trials in which any chemotherapy treatment was compared with a placebo group or best supportive care in patients with extensive stage SCLC.
Data collection and analysis: Data extraction and quality assessment were undertaken independently by two reviewers and disagreements were resolved by a third author. Additional information on the included studies was obtained from the author of the original studies.
Main results: Only two studies (the first published in 1977 and the second in 1982) met the inclusion criteria of the review. A total of 65 patients with extensive disease (33 in the first study and 32 in the second) were randomised to received either placebo treatment or ifosfamide. In the second study a third arm of comparison included ifosfamide plus CCNU. Ifosfamide gave an extra 78.5 days survival (mean survival time) compared with the placebo group. Partial tumour response was greater with the active treatment. Toxicity was only seen in the chemotherapy group. Pooled analysis was not possible because only mean survival time was reported in both studies for patients with extensive disease.
Reviewer's conclusions: Chemotherapeutic treatment prolongs survival in comparison with placebo in patients with advanced SCLC. Nevertheless the impact of chemotherapy on quality of life and in patients with poor prognosis is unknown. Well-designed, controlled trials are needed to further evaluate the risks and benefits of different chemotherapeutic schedules in patients with advanced small cell lung cancer.
Similar articles
-
Chemotherapy versus best supportive care for extensive small cell lung cancer.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013 Nov 27;2013(11):CD001990. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001990.pub3. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013. PMID: 24282143 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Chemotherapy versus best supportive care for extensive small cell lung cancer.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2009 Oct 7;(4):CD001990. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001990.pub2. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2009. Update in: Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013 Nov 27;(11):CD001990. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001990.pub3 PMID: 19821287 Updated. Review.
-
Second-line chemotherapy for non-small cell lung cancer.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2002;(2):CD002804. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD002804. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2002. PMID: 12076452 Review.
-
Platinum versus non-platinum chemotherapy regimens for small cell lung cancer.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015 Aug 2;2015(8):CD006849. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD006849.pub3. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015. PMID: 26233609 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Platinum versus non-platinum chemotherapy regimens for small cell lung cancer.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2008 Oct 8;(4):CD006849. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD006849.pub2. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2008. Update in: Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015 Aug 02;(8):CD006849. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD006849.pub3 PMID: 18843733 Updated. Review.
Cited by
-
Prognostic Significance of the Advanced Lung Cancer Inflammation Index in Metastatic Small Cell Lung Cancer: A Retrospective Analysis of 96 Patients.Med Sci Monit. 2024 Sep 11;30:e945752. doi: 10.12659/MSM.945752. Med Sci Monit. 2024. PMID: 39256975 Free PMC article.
-
Small cell lung cancer in young patients: trends in sociodemographic factors, diagnosis, treatment, and survival.J Thorac Dis. 2022 Aug;14(8):2880-2893. doi: 10.21037/jtd-22-210. J Thorac Dis. 2022. PMID: 36071763 Free PMC article.
-
State-of-the-Art Molecular Oncology of Lung Cancer in Taiwan.Int J Mol Sci. 2022 Jun 24;23(13):7037. doi: 10.3390/ijms23137037. Int J Mol Sci. 2022. PMID: 35806042 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Bone Metastasis of Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer Showing Pathological Complete Response to Osimertinib Monotherapy.Case Rep Oncol. 2021 Dec 30;14(3):1876-1881. doi: 10.1159/000520473. eCollection 2021 Sep-Dec. Case Rep Oncol. 2021. PMID: 35111023 Free PMC article.
-
Racial and Other Healthcare Disparities in Patients With Extensive-Stage SCLC.JTO Clin Res Rep. 2020 Oct 20;2(1):100109. doi: 10.1016/j.jtocrr.2020.100109. eCollection 2021 Jan. JTO Clin Res Rep. 2020. PMID: 34589974 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Miscellaneous
