Predictive validity despite social desirability: evidence for the robustness of self-report among offenders

Crim Behav Ment Health. 2003;13(2):140-50. doi: 10.1002/cbm.536.

Abstract

Introduction: Many professionals believe that self-report questionnaires used to predict recidivism have a low validity. The aim of the present study was to investigate the assumption that the validity of self-report is vulnerable to self-presentation biases in offender samples.

Method: The participants consisted of 124 male offenders who volunteered to complete the Self-Appraisal Questionnaire (SAQ).

Results: Lower scores on measures of social desirability were significantly associated with higher levels of risk (as measured by self-report and a rated actuarial instrument) and a higher likelihood to re-offend. Further, stepwise regression analysis revealed that social desirability added significantly unique variance in the prediction of violent recidivism.

Discussion: The authors propose that impression management may be an enduring person-based characteristic within an offender sample rather than a situationally determined response style. The variance associated with this characterological information is proposed to be the source of the unique predictive variance.

Publication types

  • Validation Study

MeSH terms

  • Adolescent
  • Adult
  • Crime / psychology*
  • Humans
  • Male
  • Middle Aged
  • Predictive Value of Tests
  • Psychometrics
  • Recurrence
  • Regression Analysis
  • Reproducibility of Results
  • Risk Assessment
  • Self-Assessment*
  • Social Behavior*