In vivo behavior of three different injectable hydraulic calcium phosphate cements
- PMID: 14643619
- DOI: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2003.08.073
In vivo behavior of three different injectable hydraulic calcium phosphate cements
Abstract
Two dicalcium phosphate dihydrate (DCPD) hydraulic cements and one apatite hydraulic cement were implanted in epiphyseal and metaphyseal, cylindrical bone defects of sheep. The in vivo study was performed to assess the biocompatibility of the DCPD cements, using the apatite cement as control. After time periods of 2, 4 and 6 months the cement samples were clinically and histologically evaluated. Histomorphometrically the amount of new bone formation, fibrous tissue and the area of remaining cement were measured over time. In all specimens, no signs of inflammation were detectable either macroscopically or microscopically. All cements were replaced by different amounts of new bone. The two DCPD-cements showed the highest new bone formation and least cement remnants at 6 months, whereas the apatite was almost unchanged over all time periods.
Similar articles
-
Evaluation of four biodegradable, injectable bone cements in an experimental drill hole model in sheep.Eur J Pharm Biopharm. 2013 Sep;85(1):130-8. doi: 10.1016/j.ejpb.2013.04.013. Epub 2013 May 13. Eur J Pharm Biopharm. 2013. PMID: 23680585
-
Biocompatibility and resorption of a brushite calcium phosphate cement.Biomaterials. 2005 Jul;26(21):4383-94. doi: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2004.11.056. Biomaterials. 2005. PMID: 15701367
-
Compositional changes of a dicalcium phosphate dihydrate cement after implantation in sheep.Biomaterials. 2003 Sep;24(20):3463-74. doi: 10.1016/s0142-9612(03)00234-5. Biomaterials. 2003. PMID: 12809775
-
Diagnosis and treatment of common fractures in children: femoral shaft fractures and supracondylar humeral fractures.J Surg Orthop Adv. 2006 Spring;15(1):1-15. J Surg Orthop Adv. 2006. PMID: 16603106 Review.
-
Dicalcium phosphate cements: brushite and monetite.Acta Biomater. 2012 Feb;8(2):474-87. doi: 10.1016/j.actbio.2011.08.005. Epub 2011 Aug 12. Acta Biomater. 2012. PMID: 21856456 Review.
Cited by
-
Bifunctional bone substitute materials for bone defect treatment after bone tumor resection.Mater Today Bio. 2023 Dec 1;23:100889. doi: 10.1016/j.mtbio.2023.100889. eCollection 2023 Dec. Mater Today Bio. 2023. PMID: 38149015 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Degradation and Bone-Contact Biocompatibility of Two Drillable Magnesium Phosphate Bone Cements in an In Vivo Rabbit Bone Defect Model.Materials (Basel). 2023 Jun 28;16(13):4650. doi: 10.3390/ma16134650. Materials (Basel). 2023. PMID: 37444964 Free PMC article.
-
Calcium Phosphate Cements as Carriers of Functional Substances for the Treatment of Bone Tissue.Materials (Basel). 2023 May 27;16(11):4017. doi: 10.3390/ma16114017. Materials (Basel). 2023. PMID: 37297151 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Preparation and characterization of different micro/nano structures on the surface of bredigite scaffolds.Sci Rep. 2023 Jun 5;13(1):9072. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-36382-z. Sci Rep. 2023. PMID: 37277439 Free PMC article.
-
Biodegradable Cements for Bone Regeneration.J Funct Biomater. 2023 Feb 27;14(3):134. doi: 10.3390/jfb14030134. J Funct Biomater. 2023. PMID: 36976058 Free PMC article. Review.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical
