Surgeon volume and operative mortality in the United States
- PMID: 14645640
- DOI: 10.1056/NEJMsa035205
Surgeon volume and operative mortality in the United States
Abstract
Background: Although the relation between hospital volume and surgical mortality is well established, for most procedures, the relative importance of the experience of the operating surgeon is uncertain.
Methods: Using information from the national Medicare claims data base for 1998 through 1999, we examined mortality among all 474,108 patients who underwent one of eight cardiovascular procedures or cancer resections. Using nested regression models, we examined the relations between operative mortality and surgeon volume and hospital volume (each in terms of total procedures performed per year), with adjustment for characteristics of the patients and other characteristics of the providers.
Results: Surgeon volume was inversely related to operative mortality for all eight procedures (P=0.003 for lung resection, P<0.001 for all other procedures). The adjusted odds ratio for operative death (for patients with a low-volume surgeon vs. those with a high-volume surgeon) varied widely according to the procedure--from 1.24 for lung resection to 3.61 for pancreatic resection. Surgeon volume accounted for a large proportion of the apparent effect of the hospital volume, to an extent that varied according to the procedure: it accounted for 100 percent of the effect for aortic-valve replacement, 57 percent for elective repair of an abdominal aortic aneurysm, 55 percent for pancreatic resection, 49 percent for coronary-artery bypass grafting, 46 percent for esophagectomy, 39 percent for cystectomy, and 24 percent for lung resection. For most procedures, the mortality rate was higher among patients of low-volume surgeons than among those of high-volume surgeons, regardless of the surgical volume of the hospital in which they practiced.
Conclusions: For many procedures, the observed associations between hospital volume and operative mortality are largely mediated by surgeon volume. Patients can often improve their chances of survival substantially, even at high-volume hospitals, by selecting surgeons who perform the operations frequently.
Copyright 2003 Massachusetts Medical Society
Comment in
-
The volume-outcome conundrum.N Engl J Med. 2003 Nov 27;349(22):2159-61. doi: 10.1056/NEJMe038166. N Engl J Med. 2003. PMID: 14645645 No abstract available.
-
Surgeon volume and operative mortality.N Engl J Med. 2004 Mar 18;350(12):1256-8; author reply 1256-8. doi: 10.1056/NEJM200403183501217. N Engl J Med. 2004. PMID: 15028832 No abstract available.
-
Surgeon volume and operative mortality.N Engl J Med. 2004 Mar 18;350(12):1256-8; author reply 1256-8. N Engl J Med. 2004. PMID: 15031860 No abstract available.
-
Surgeon volume and operative mortality.N Engl J Med. 2004 Mar 18;350(12):1256-8; author reply 1256-8. N Engl J Med. 2004. PMID: 15031861 No abstract available.
Similar articles
-
Hospital volume and inpatient mortality after cancer-related gastrointestinal resections: the experience of an Asian country.Ann Surg Oncol. 2006 Sep;13(9):1182-8. doi: 10.1245/s10434-006-9005-0. Epub 2006 Aug 5. Ann Surg Oncol. 2006. PMID: 16897270
-
Trends in hospital and surgeon volume and operative mortality for cancer surgery.Ann Surg Oncol. 2006 Jun;13(6):851-8. doi: 10.1245/ASO.2006.07.021. Epub 2006 Apr 13. Ann Surg Oncol. 2006. PMID: 16614875
-
Associations between hospital and surgeon procedure volumes and patient outcomes after ovarian cancer resection.J Natl Cancer Inst. 2006 Feb 1;98(3):163-71. doi: 10.1093/jnci/djj018. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2006. PMID: 16449676
-
Specialty matters in the treatment of lung cancer.Semin Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2012 Summer;24(2):99-105. doi: 10.1053/j.semtcvs.2012.06.002. Semin Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2012. PMID: 22920525 Review.
-
How are volume-outcome associations related to models of health care funding and delivery? A comparison of the United States and Canada.World J Surg. 2005 Oct;29(10):1230-3. doi: 10.1007/s00268-005-7994-7. World J Surg. 2005. PMID: 16132398 Review.
Cited by
-
Outcomes of emergency colorectal surgery within a non-colorectal split site service-a retrospective cohort study.Ir J Med Sci. 2024 Nov 8. doi: 10.1007/s11845-024-03837-9. Online ahead of print. Ir J Med Sci. 2024. PMID: 39514160
-
Caseload per Year in Robotic-Assisted Minimally Invasive Esophagectomy: A Narrative Review.Cancers (Basel). 2024 Oct 19;16(20):3538. doi: 10.3390/cancers16203538. Cancers (Basel). 2024. PMID: 39456633 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Comparison of Outcomes for Patients Treated by Allopathic vs Osteopathic Surgeons.JAMA Surg. 2024 Oct 16:e244580. doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2024.4580. Online ahead of print. JAMA Surg. 2024. PMID: 39412774
-
Supporting early-career military general surgeons: an Eastern Association for the Surgery of Trauma Military Committee position paper.Trauma Surg Acute Care Open. 2024 Oct 12;9(1):e001555. doi: 10.1136/tsaco-2024-001555. eCollection 2024. Trauma Surg Acute Care Open. 2024. PMID: 39411007 Free PMC article.
-
Clinical Outcomes and Long-term Survivorship After Osteochondral Autologous Transfer Combined With Valgus High Tibial Osteotomy: An Analysis After 19 Years With 56 Patients.Am J Sports Med. 2024 Oct;52(12):3004-3012. doi: 10.1177/03635465241280231. Epub 2024 Oct 3. Am J Sports Med. 2024. PMID: 39360335 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical