Comparison of accuracy between the Partin tables of 1997 and 2001 to predict final pathological stage in clinically localized prostate cancer

J Urol. 2004 Jan;171(1):177-81. doi: 10.1097/01.ju.0000099827.77355.a7.

Abstract

Purpose: We validated externally the predictive accuracy of the 2001 Partin tables and compared the 1997 and 2001 versions.

Materials and methods: We used ROC derived AUC to test the predictive accuracy of organ confinement (OC), extraprostatic extension (ECE), seminal vesicle invasion (SVI) and lymph node involvement (LNI) of 1997 and 2001 Partin tables derived probabilities. These probabilities were defined by the pretreatment clinical stage, serum prostate specific antigen and biopsy Gleason grade of 2,139 patients treated with radical prostatectomy for clinically localized prostate cancer.

Results: OC, ECE, SVI and LNI were noted in 63.5%, 23.1%, 10.5% and 2.9% of cases, respectively. AUC of the 2001 tables was 0.787, 0.766, 0.775 and 0.790, for OC, ECE, SVI and LNI, respectively. These values were virtually the same as the respective 1997 Partin table AUC values, namely 0.784, 0.728, 0.791 and 0.799.

Conclusions: This external validation of the 2001 Partin tables confirms good predictive accuracy of the updated tables. However, predictive accuracy in this external validation data set of 2,139 European men is virtually the same as that of the original 1997 tables. Therefore, a transition from the 1997 tables to the updated 2001 version does not appear warranted unless superior accuracy is demonstrated in other external cohorts.

Publication types

  • Comparative Study

MeSH terms

  • Adult
  • Aged
  • Area Under Curve
  • Humans
  • Male
  • Middle Aged
  • Neoplasm Staging
  • Predictive Value of Tests
  • Prostatic Neoplasms / pathology*
  • ROC Curve
  • Reproducibility of Results