Can a mortality excess in remote areas of Australia be explained by indigenous status? A case study using neonatal mortality in Queensland

Aust N Z J Public Health. 2003;27(4):425-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-842x.2003.tb00421.x.

Abstract

Objective: To assess the extent to which indigenous status confounds the association between remoteness and neonatal mortality in Queensland.

Methods: We used routine data from the Queensland Perinatal Data Collection. Poisson regression modelling was used to assess confounding.

Results: Babies born to Indigenous mothers have mortality rates 2.42 times those of the rest of the population, regardless of whether they live in urban, rural or remote areas (95% CI 2.09-2.80). The babies of non-Indigenous women who live in remote areas have a low risk of neonatal death, similar to their rural and urban counterparts.

Conclusion: In Queensland, the key demographic variable that determines neonatal mortality is indigenous status, not remoteness.

Implications: Policymakers should not assume that an excess of a particular health problem in remote areas necessarily reflects equal disadvantage for all the Australians who live there.

Publication types

  • Comparative Study

MeSH terms

  • Fetal Death / ethnology*
  • Humans
  • Infant Mortality*
  • Infant, Newborn
  • Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander / statistics & numerical data*
  • Poisson Distribution
  • Queensland / epidemiology
  • Rural Health / statistics & numerical data
  • Urban Health / statistics & numerical data