The repeatability of forced expiratory volume measurements in adults with cystic fibrosis

Chest. 2004 Jan;125(1):150-5. doi: 10.1378/chest.125.1.150.


Study objective: To determine the repeatability of measurements of FEV(1) in adults with lung disease due to cystic fibrosis (CF).

Design: Single cohort study nested within a randomized controlled trial.

Setting: Adult CF of a university teaching hospital. Subjects were participants in a randomized trial of an experimental mucolytic drug.

Patients: Twenty-one adults (mean age, 27.5 +/- 9.2 years [+/- SD]) with CF and mild-to-moderate airflow obstruction (FEV(1) 70 +/- 15% predicted). Patients were in clinically stable condition prior to and during the study.

Interventions: Repeated FEV(1) measurements were obtained at specific times of the day for 9 consecutive days, for a total of 31 measurements from each subject. Statistical measures of repeatability were calculated. Variation over the course of 1 day and variation from 1 day to the next were examined separately.

Measurements and results: For day-to-day FEV(1) measurements, the within-subject SD was 0.145 L (4.5% of predicted), indicating greater variation compared to values previously established in normal subjects. The coefficient of repeatability indicated that day-to-day measurements could differ by as much as 13% of predicted in the absence of clinical change. For measurements within a single day, variation was not observed to be greater than normal.

Conclusions: In adults with CF, day-to-day variation in FEV(1) measurements is greater than normal and similar to that seen in other obstructive lung diseases. Changes in FEV(1) over time in adults with CF can likely be interpreted using the same criteria that apply to asthma or COPD.

Publication types

  • Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

MeSH terms

  • Adolescent
  • Adult
  • Circadian Rhythm
  • Cohort Studies
  • Cystic Fibrosis / physiopathology*
  • Female
  • Forced Expiratory Volume*
  • Humans
  • Male
  • Middle Aged
  • Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic
  • Reproducibility of Results